Cited 0 time in
An extended CoCoSo method under (p–q) rung orthopair fuzzy environment for multi-criteria decision-making applications
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Khan, Asghar | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Barukab, Omar | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Jun, Young Bae | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Khan, Sher Afzal | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Ahmad, Umair | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Rushdi, Ali Muhammad Ali | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-07-22T05:00:09Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-07-22T05:00:09Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-07 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2045-2322 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2045-2322 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/79527 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | The management of health care waste (HCW) is a major environmental and public health challenge, especially in developing nations. A complex multi-criteria decision analysis problem encompassing both qualitative and quantitative aspects is the choice of the best technology for HCW disposal. It is possible to evaluate HCW treatment technologies using ambiguous or inaccurate data. Furthermore, the majority of current HCW decision models are unable to account for these intricate interactions. The (p–q) rung orthopair fuzzy set is integrated in this research to present a novel hybrid multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) model. Due to the greater range of their membership grades, (p–q) rung orthopair fuzzy sets can offer more ambiguous scenarios than Fermatean, Pythagorean, and intuitionistic fuzzy sets. We first develop basic operational criteria to characterize some aggregation operators (AOs) under Sugeno–Weber operations, comprising the Sugeno–Weber weighted averaging operator for (p–q) rung orthopairs ((p–q) ROFSWWA). We investigate these operators’ basic characteristics in further detail. To determine the ranking of alternatives, an enhanced combination compromise solution approach is suggested in this study. We provide a case study on HCW management selection to demonstrate the usefulness of our suggested approach. Comparing our suggested decision-making procedure to current MCDM techniques demonstrates its high efficacy and dependability in evaluating and rating HCW. © The Author(s) 2025. | - |
| dc.language | 영어 | - |
| dc.language.iso | ENG | - |
| dc.publisher | Nature Publishing Group | - |
| dc.title | An extended CoCoSo method under (p–q) rung orthopair fuzzy environment for multi-criteria decision-making applications | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.publisher.location | 영국 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1038/s41598-025-06020-x | - |
| dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-105010039825 | - |
| dc.identifier.wosid | 001546921400011 | - |
| dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Scientific Reports, v.15, no.1 | - |
| dc.citation.title | Scientific Reports | - |
| dc.citation.volume | 15 | - |
| dc.citation.number | 1 | - |
| dc.type.docType | Article | - |
| dc.description.isOpenAccess | Y | - |
| dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
| dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
| dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Science & Technology - Other Topics | - |
| dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Multidisciplinary Sciences | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | (p–q) rung orthopair fuzzy set | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | CoCoSo method | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Health care waste | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | MCDM | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Sugeno–Weber aggregation operator | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Gyeongsang National University Central Library, 501, Jinju-daero, Jinju-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, 52828, Republic of Korea+82-55-772-0532
COPYRIGHT 2022 GYEONGSANG NATIONAL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.
