AHP법을 이용한 효율적인 농촌중심지의 정주계층 구분 방안 - 경상남도 고성군·하동군을 중심으로 -

Abstract

This study suggested a method of classifying the hierarchy of settlement of rural centers to select a target site for Rural Development Projects and an improvement plan to reflect the results of centrality analysis in the project. Based on the guidelines for the promotion of Rural Development Projects, evaluation items for the classification of settlements hierarchy were constructed, and an Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) importance survey evaluation table was created. Since the evaluation grade interval is set differently depending on the purpose of evaluation and the evaluator, in this study, relative grade classification by statistical methods and grade classification by determining the presence or absence of evaluation factors were used as the type of grade classification of evaluation criteria. The evaluation results were derived by applying the functional index method, the modified function index method reflecting the AHP survey results, and the evaluation score reflecting the AHP weighting value and evaluation grade to the case area. As three evaluation methods, the hierarchy of settlements in the rural center of the case area were divided into four stages. The hierarchical classification by the functional index method is arranged in the order of the highest functional index, and the central class is classified by disconnection, so differences may occur depending on the evaluator. However, in the case of evaluation using evaluation scores, the hierarchy is clearly distinguished based on a total of 100, so that the difference between evaluators can be reduced, and the hierarchy distinction by Eup/Myeon in rural centers can be clearly distinguished. If the AHP hierarchy of settlement and evaluation score reflecting the evaluation grade presented in the study are used, it is easy to identify facilities that are insufficient or need to be improvement in each rural centers and establish a business plan. In the future, it is expected that it can be used in rural development practice if the scope of experts is expanded to supplement evaluation items and importance evaluation, and if the evaluation grade is set by analyzing functional facility data in Gyeongsangnam-do or rural centers of nationwide.