Cited 0 time in
Application of Machine Learning Models for Predicting Methane Concentrations in Pig Barns Using Biophysical Data
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Basak, Jayanta Kumar | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Paudel, Bhola | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Deb, Nibas Chandra | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Kang, Dae Yeong | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Salam, Mohammed Abdus | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Sonet, Sanjay Saha | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Kim, Hyeon Tae | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-05-08T05:30:14Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-05-08T05:30:14Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-05 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0049-6979 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1573-2932 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/78156 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | The prediction of methane (CH4) concentration is important for pig farming due to its environmental impact on pigs and farm workers. This study examined the utilization of machine learning algorithms, specifically multiple linear regression (MLR), XGBoost regression (XGB), and random forest regression (RFR), to predict CH4 concentrations in pig barns during the growing-finishing stage of pigs. The dataset included five key input biophysical variables: feed intake (FI), pig mass (MP), carbon dioxide (CO2) levels, temperature (T), and relative humidity (RH). Data was collected from three experimental pig barns during 2022 and 2023 to train and test the machine learning models. Among the three machine learning models, the RFR consistently outperformed both MLR and XGB in predicting CH4 concentrations. The results demonstrated better performance by the RFR model in testing (R-2 > 0.81), with improvements in R-2 of up to 1.92% and 10.46%, as well as decreases in RMSE of up to 5.74% and 20.51%, compared to the XGB and MLR across the three input datasets. In terms of stability, MLR exhibited the maximum stability, followed by RFR and XGB. Sensitivity analysis found FI to be the most influential input variable for CH4 concentration prediction, with the impact ranking being FI > MP > CO2 > T > RH. This study emphasized the potential of machine learning models, particularly RFR, in predicting CH4 concentrations using relevant input variables. These findings enhance understanding of CH4 concentration, providing useful insights into pig production and environmental management. | - |
| dc.language | 영어 | - |
| dc.language.iso | ENG | - |
| dc.publisher | Springer | - |
| dc.title | Application of Machine Learning Models for Predicting Methane Concentrations in Pig Barns Using Biophysical Data | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.publisher.location | 스위스 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s11270-025-07954-8 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-105002800990 | - |
| dc.identifier.wosid | 001464281000001 | - |
| dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, v.236, no.5 | - |
| dc.citation.title | Water, Air, & Soil Pollution | - |
| dc.citation.volume | 236 | - |
| dc.citation.number | 5 | - |
| dc.type.docType | Article | - |
| dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
| dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
| dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
| dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Environmental Sciences & Ecology | - |
| dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences | - |
| dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Water Resources | - |
| dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Environmental Sciences | - |
| dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences | - |
| dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Water Resources | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | CARBON-DIOXIDE | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | EMISSION | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | GREENHOUSE | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | MANAGEMENT | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | REGRESSION | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | COMMUNITY | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | AMMONIA | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | FIBER | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | SWINE | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Environmental factors | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Machine learning models | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Methane prediction | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Model stability | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Pig farming | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Sensitivity analysis | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Gyeongsang National University Central Library, 501, Jinju-daero, Jinju-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, 52828, Republic of Korea+82-55-772-0532
COPYRIGHT 2022 GYEONGSANG NATIONAL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.
