Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

A survey on laboratory capacity, testing practices, and management during COVID-19 pandemic response in Korea: a cross-sectional survey studyopen access

Authors
유창승김대원변정현장정현조성진성흥섭
Issue Date
Mar-2025
Publisher
대한임상미생물학회
Keywords
COVID-19; Outbreak response; Pandemics; PCR; SARS-CoV-2
Citation
Annals of Clinical Microbiology, v.28, no.1, pp 5 - 5
Pages
1
Indexed
KCI
Journal Title
Annals of Clinical Microbiology
Volume
28
Number
1
Start Page
5
End Page
5
URI
https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/77871
DOI
10.5145/ACM.2025.28.1.5
ISSN
2288-0585
2288-6850
Abstract
Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has significantly impactedglobal infrastructure. We surveyed laboratories to analyze the changes in testing methods andprocedures to improve future pandemic preparedness. Methods: This study surveyed laboratory physicians and technologists in South Korea andanalyzed responses from 126 of 323 institutions. The survey was conducted in May 2023using the proficiency test of the Korean Association of External Quality Assessment Serviceand examined the diagnostic procedures, personnel, equipment, and quality control. Thesurvey comprised 15 questions covering respondent demographics, public-private proficiencyprojects, COVID-19 testing procedures, and laboratory status. Results: Of the 126 laboratories, 66.7% performed bacterial smear and culture, 65.9% hadbiosafety level 2 facilities, and 39.7% had separate nucleic acid extraction areas. Furthermore,98.4% of the laboratories had biological safety cabinets, the median number of PCR machineswas four units, and 77.8% had autoclaves. The median numbers of personnel managing andconducting tests were one and three, respectively. Additionally, 88.1% of the laboratoriesfound the COVID-19 proficiency test helpful, with key benefits in terms of accuracy and skillimprovement. COVID-19 tests were primarily used for symptomatic or contact person testing,pre-admission screening, and periodic proactive testing. Specialized testing laboratoriesconducted up to 50,000 tests daily, and tertiary hospitals conducted up to 1,500 tests. Emergency, pooled, and rapid antigen tests were widely used. Most respondents wantedfuture tests for respiratory viruses, bacteria, and viral diarrhea, indicating a willingness toparticipate. Conclusion: Aggressive testing and collaboration between health agencies and laboratoriesare crucial for managing emerging diseases. Systematic preparations are essential to maintain and strengthen laboratory capabilities for future infectious disease outbreaks.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
ETC > Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE