Cited 0 time in
Comparison of Conductive Materials for LiFePO4 Electrodes: Biomass-Derived Activated Carbon and Carbon Black
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Jeon, Chang Hun | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Lee, Sang Jun | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Lee, Dong Park | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Kim, Joo-Hyung | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-04-14T09:00:12Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-04-14T09:00:12Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024-11 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1225-0562 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2287-7258 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/77764 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Super P (SP) is a conductive carbon black that significantly enhances the electrical conductivity of various types of electrodes, making it a widely preferred conductive agent in lithium-ion batteries. By contrast, activated carbon (AC), originally used in capacitors due to its porous structure, is expected to contribute to electrochemical performance through its enhanced interaction with lithium ions. First, the physical properties of both materials were analyzed through various characterization techniques such as scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to confirm the increase in electrochemical properties through the combination of SP and AC. Furthermore, the microstructure and electrical properties of the LiFePO4 (LFP) electrode were analyzed, to determine the impact on battery performance. With a 1.15 M LiPF6 in an ethylene carbonate/diethyl carbonate (EC/DEC) electrolyte, the results indicated that SP-only electrodes exhibited the highest conductivity and lowest surface resistance, making them the most effective at maintaining stable electrochemical performance. In contrast, electrodes with only AC showed higher resistance, demonstrating that SP remains superior in improving LFP electrode conductivity, ultimately optimizing lithium-ion battery performance. | - |
| dc.format.extent | 7 | - |
| dc.language | 한국어 | - |
| dc.language.iso | KOR | - |
| dc.publisher | 한국재료학회 | - |
| dc.title | Comparison of Conductive Materials for LiFePO4 Electrodes: Biomass-Derived Activated Carbon and Carbon Black | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.publisher.location | 대한민국 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.3740/MRSK.2024.34.11.577 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-105000406015 | - |
| dc.identifier.wosid | 001447631500006 | - |
| dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Korean Journal of Materials Research, v.34, no.11, pp 577 - 583 | - |
| dc.citation.title | Korean Journal of Materials Research | - |
| dc.citation.volume | 34 | - |
| dc.citation.number | 11 | - |
| dc.citation.startPage | 577 | - |
| dc.citation.endPage | 583 | - |
| dc.type.docType | Article | - |
| dc.identifier.kciid | ART003142771 | - |
| dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
| dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
| dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | esci | - |
| dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
| dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Materials Science | - |
| dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Materials Science, Multidisciplinary | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | ELECTRICAL-CONDUCTIVITY | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | CATHODE | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | OXIDE | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | activated carbon | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | electrical conductivity | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | LiFePO4 | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | carbon black | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Gyeongsang National University Central Library, 501, Jinju-daero, Jinju-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, 52828, Republic of Korea+82-55-772-0532
COPYRIGHT 2022 GYEONGSANG NATIONAL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.
