Cited 0 time in
보건의료에서 간병비용 산출방법에 관한 쟁점
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | 김윤희 | - |
| dc.contributor.author | 박주연 | - |
| dc.contributor.author | 정예지 | - |
| dc.contributor.author | 김지민 | - |
| dc.contributor.author | 이태진 | - |
| dc.contributor.author | 배은영 | - |
| dc.contributor.author | 송현진 | - |
| dc.contributor.author | 신상진 | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-02-26T08:00:09Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-02-26T08:00:09Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2014-12 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2288-5811 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 3022-4969 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/77225 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Objectives: This study was conducted to explore the issues related the costing method of caregiving cost in healthcare. Methods: We reviewed literature on the definition and the valuation method of caregiver costs. After we have expert meeting with critical issues of methodology, we provided the feasible costing method in Korea. Results: There are a broad of spectrum of the definition of caregiver cost. It’s useful to separate into paid caregiver cost and informal care cost in Korea. In addition, it is necessary to identify whether the reason of caregiving is patient’s medical utilization or only morbidity without medical use. The valuation of paid caregiver is relatively explicit. However, that of informal care has a lot of issues and has several methods-opportunity cost method, proxy goods method, contingent valuation method and conjoint measurement. Conclusion: It is necessary for researchers to choose and specify their definition and the valuation for costing of caregiver cost with their research purpose. | - |
| dc.format.extent | 6 | - |
| dc.language | 한국어 | - |
| dc.language.iso | KOR | - |
| dc.publisher | 한국보건의료기술평가학회 | - |
| dc.title | 보건의료에서 간병비용 산출방법에 관한 쟁점 | - |
| dc.title.alternative | Issues for Costing Method of Caregiving in Healthcare | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.publisher.location | 대한민국 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.34161/johta.2014.2.2.003 | - |
| dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | 보건의료기술평가, v.2, no.2, pp 93 - 98 | - |
| dc.citation.title | 보건의료기술평가 | - |
| dc.citation.volume | 2 | - |
| dc.citation.number | 2 | - |
| dc.citation.startPage | 93 | - |
| dc.citation.endPage | 98 | - |
| dc.identifier.kciid | ART002336699 | - |
| dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
| dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kciCandi | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Caregiver cost · Informal care · Costing method · Opportunity cost method · Proxy goods method · Contingent valuation method · Conjoint measurement | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Gyeongsang National University Central Library, 501, Jinju-daero, Jinju-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, 52828, Republic of Korea+82-55-772-0532
COPYRIGHT 2022 GYEONGSANG NATIONAL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.
