Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Validation of Recalibrated TONOVET Plus and TONOVET Pro in Canine Eyes Compared to Manometer and TONOVET

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorLee, Jiwon-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Wontae-
dc.contributor.authorShim, Jaeho-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Yujin-
dc.contributor.authorKang, Seonmi-
dc.contributor.authorYoo, Young-Kyoung-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Young-Ho-
dc.contributor.authorSeo, Kangmoon-
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-25T02:00:09Z-
dc.date.available2025-02-25T02:00:09Z-
dc.date.issued2025-02-
dc.identifier.issn1463-5216-
dc.identifier.issn1463-5224-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/77200-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To evaluate the accuracy of recalibrated TONOVET Plus (rTVP) and the newly released TONOVET Pro (TVPR) in measuring intraocular pressure (IOP) in ex vivo canine eyes compared to manometer and the established TONOVET (TV). Procedure: Sixteen enucleated canine eyes were cannulated to establish manometric IOPs ranging from 5 to 80 mmHg. IOP measurements were obtained using TV, rTVP, and TVPR. Results: All tonometers showed a strong correlation with the manometer (R-2 > 0.98). Measurements from rTVP and TVPR exhibited almost perfect agreement with the manometer (CCC = 0.9974 for both), whereas TV demonstrated lower agreement (CCC = 0.9874) associated with greater systematic bias. Specifically, TV showed a lower proportional bias (95% confidence interval [CI] of the slope = 0.987-1.006) but a larger systematic bias (intercept = -3.33 mmHg) compared to rTVP and TVPR (95% CI of the slope = 1.045-1.066 and 1.045-1.063; intercept = -2.532 and -2.633 mmHg, respectively). In accuracy analyses by range, rTVP and TVPR showed no significant difference from the manometer in the 30-70 mmHg and 35-80 mmHg IOP ranges, respectively. Conclusions: Among the ICare rebound tonometers, rTVP and TVPR provided the most accurate IOP measurements in the ex vivo analysis and demonstrated particularly strong agreement in the high IOP range, suggesting their suitability for IOP measurement in glaucomatous patients.-
dc.language영어-
dc.language.isoENG-
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Inc.-
dc.titleValidation of Recalibrated TONOVET Plus and TONOVET Pro in Canine Eyes Compared to Manometer and TONOVET-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.publisher.location미국-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/vop.70002-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85218834974-
dc.identifier.wosid001420759400001-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationVeterinary Ophthalmology-
dc.citation.titleVeterinary Ophthalmology-
dc.type.docTypeArticle; Early Access-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaVeterinary Sciences-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryVeterinary Sciences-
dc.subject.keywordPlusINTRAOCULAR-PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusHAND-HELD TONOMETERS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusREBOUND TONOMETER-
dc.subject.keywordPlusAPPLANATION TONOMETER-
dc.subject.keywordPlusACCURACY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusDOGS-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorintraocular pressure-
dc.subject.keywordAuthormanometer-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorrebound tonometer-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorTONOVET-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorTONOVET Plus-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorTONOVET Pro-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
수의과대학 > Department of Veterinary Medicine > Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Shim, Jaeho photo

Shim, Jaeho
수의과대학 (수의학과)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE