Detailed Information

Cited 5 time in webofscience Cited 4 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Exosomes isolation from bovine serum: qualitative and quantitative comparison between ultracentrifugation, combination ultracentrifugation and size exclusion chromatography, and exoEasy methodsopen accessExosomes isolation from bovine serum: qualitative and quantitative comparison between ultracentrifugation, combination ultracentrifugation and size exclusion chromatography, and exoEasy methods

Other Titles
Exosomes isolation from bovine serum: qualitative and quantitative comparison between ultracentrifugation, combination ultracentrifugation and size exclusion chromatography, and exoEasy methods
Authors
Eun-Yeong BokSang Young SeoHan Gyu LeeSudu Hakuruge Madusha Pramud WimalasenaEunju KimAra ChoYoung Hun JungTai-Young HurKyoung-Min So이성림Yoon Jung Do
Issue Date
Sep-2024
Publisher
Korean Society of Animal Sciences and Technology
Keywords
Exosomes; Ultracentrifugation; Combination of ultracentrifugation and size-exclusion chromatography; exoEasy kit; Bovine serum
Citation
Journal of Animal Science and Technology, v.66, no.5, pp 1021 - 1033
Pages
13
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
KCI
Journal Title
Journal of Animal Science and Technology
Volume
66
Number
5
Start Page
1021
End Page
1033
URI
https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/74733
DOI
10.5187/jast.2024.e45
ISSN
2672-0191
2055-0391
Abstract
Exosomes have been extensively studied as disease biomarker in humans, given their role in transporting bioactive molecules. However, despite the great potential of exosomes as noninvasive diagnostic markers and therapeutic nanocarriers for bovine diseases, few studies have been conducted on bovine exosome. Thus, this study aimed to quantitatively and qualitatively compare three isolation methods to identify a suitable method for bovine serum. Exosomes were isolated using ultracentrifugation alone (UC), a combination of ultracentrifugation and size exclusion chromatography (US), or membrane affinity-based exoEasy kit (EE). Isolated particles were evaluated using a range of complementary techniques. Transmission electron microscopy showed that all three isolation methods resulted in particles with a cupshaped morphology. The particle concentration measured by nanoparticle trafficking analyzer of US was lower compared to those of UC and EE method. As a result of immunoblotting, exosome markers including TSG101, CD81, and HSP70 were detected in US particles, while in UC and EE, only TSG101 expression was confirmed. Particles isolated from UC and EE showed a contamination with the blood protein albumin, whereas particles from US did not show albumin contamination. In addition, to evaluate the possibility of using exosomes as biomarkers, the profiles of the small RNA in the exosomes were compared using the bioanalyzer 2100. As a result, in the EE method, the band of small RNA (25-200 nt) was most prominent, and in the US methods, a distinct band was observed in the small RNA range. Collectively, the purity of exosomes without non-exosomal contamination was highest in the US method. However, for the detection of small RNA, the EE method was found to be the most suitable. Therefore, the results suggest that the optimal isolation method varies depending on the specific purpose of exosome isolation.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
수의과대학 > Department of Veterinary Medicine > Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Lee, Sung Lim photo

Lee, Sung Lim
수의과대학 (수의학과)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE