Cited 2 time in
Modeling ammonia concentration in swine building using biophysical data and machine learning algorithms
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Basak, Jayanta Kumar | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Paudel, Bhola | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Deb, Nibas Chandra | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Kang, Dae Yeong | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Kang, Myeong Yong | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Roy, Sujit Kumar | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Shahriar, Shihab Ahmad | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Kim, Hyeon Tae | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-12-03T00:30:49Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-12-03T00:30:49Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024-10 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0168-1699 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1872-7107 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/73444 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Ammonia (NH3) concentration in livestock barns is a crucial environmental parameter affecting the well-being of animals and workers’ health. Effective management and prediction of NH3 levels are essential for maintaining an efficient and enduring swine production system. This study investigated the application of machine learning algorithms, namely support vector regression (SVR), random forest regression (RFR), and multiple linear regression (MLR), to predict NH3 concentrations in pig barns and examined the impact of individual input variables on prediction accuracy. In this study, three datasets, each comprising five key biophysical variables, i.e., feed intake (FI), mass of pig (MP), carbon dioxide (CO2) levels, temperature (T), and relative humidity (RH), were utilized for training and testing these algorithms. The data were collected from three barns during the growing-finishing stage of pigs in 2022 and 2023. The study results revealed a strong positive relationship between FI and MP with NH3 concentrations. Among the three machine learning models, the SVR outperformed the MLR and RFR in predicting NH3 concentration. The result exhibited that the SVR obtained the maximum performance in both training (R2 >0.95) and testing (R2 >0.85), with R2 improvements of up to 5.43 % and 14.02 % and RMSE decreases of up to 15.97 % and 28.98 %, in comparison to the RFR and MLR across the three input datasets in NH3 prediction. The study also emphasized the importance of dataset size, with the large dataset containing all five input indicators achieving the highest accuracy compared to smaller datasets. In addition, the MLR demonstrated maximum stability, followed by the SVR, whereas the RFR exhibited minimum stability. Sensitivity analysis revealed that FI was the most influential input variable for NH3 concentration prediction. The study ranked the impact of individual input variables as FI > MP > CO2 > T > RH. The combination of FI, MP, CO2, and T as input indicators achieved the highest model performance, accounting for a substantial portion of the variance between observed and predicted data. This study demonstrated the potential of machine learning models, particularly SVR, for predicting NH3 concentrations using relevant input variables in pig barns. These findings significantly enhance understanding of NH3 concentration dynamics in pig barns, providing crucial insights into swine production and environmental management with data-driven modeling. © 2024 Elsevier B.V. | - |
| dc.language | 영어 | - |
| dc.language.iso | ENG | - |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier BV | - |
| dc.title | Modeling ammonia concentration in swine building using biophysical data and machine learning algorithms | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.publisher.location | 영국 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.compag.2024.109269 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85199377899 | - |
| dc.identifier.wosid | 001283106200001 | - |
| dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, v.225 | - |
| dc.citation.title | Computers and Electronics in Agriculture | - |
| dc.citation.volume | 225 | - |
| dc.type.docType | Article | - |
| dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
| dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
| dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
| dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Agriculture | - |
| dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Computer Science | - |
| dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Agriculture, Multidisciplinary | - |
| dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | PIGS | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | PREDICTION | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | PROTEIN | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Ammonia concentration | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Body mass of pigs | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Environmental parameters | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Feed intake | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Machine learning models | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Gyeongsang National University Central Library, 501, Jinju-daero, Jinju-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, 52828, Republic of Korea+82-55-772-0532
COPYRIGHT 2022 GYEONGSANG NATIONAL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.
