Cited 8 time in
Effect of optic disc size on correlation between Bruch's membrane opening-minimum rim width and peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer thickness
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Cho, Hyun-kyung | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Park, Jong Moon | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Kee, Changwon | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-12-03T00:00:49Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-12-03T00:00:49Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2019-12 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0950-222X | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1476-5454 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/73306 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Objectives To investigate the effect of optic disc size on correlation between Bruch's membrane opening-minimum rim width (BMO-MRW) and peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thickness from three scan circles. Methods In this retrospective, observational study, non-glaucomatous eyes without visible RNFL defect or visual field loss were included. A total of 101 subjects were distributed into three groups based on disc size: group 1 (n = 26), small disc (disc area < 1.63 mm(2)); group 2 (n = 40), regular size disc (disc area: 1.63 similar to 2.43 mm(2)); and group 3 (n = 35), large disc (disc area > 2.43 mm(2)). All patients underwent standard ophthalmic examinations including confocal scanning laser tomography and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Results Global BMO-MRW was the thickest in group 1 (314.96 +/- 60.38 mu m, BMO area: 1.72 +/- 0.45 mm(2)), followed by that in group 2 (259.03 +/- 40.04 mu m, BMO area: 2.29 +/- 0.31 mm(2)). It was the thinnest in group 3 (236.74 +/- 31.21 mu m, BMO area: 2.91 +/- 0.31 mm(2); p < 0.001, Kruskal-Wallis test). Correlation between global BMO-MRW value and RNFL thickness was the strongest in group 3 (Spearman's rho = 0.656), followed by that in group 2 (rho = 0.572). It was the weakest in group 1 (rho = 0.147). There was no significant difference in global RNFL thickness by disc size from either the 3.5 mm, 4.1 mm, or 4.7 mm diameter scan circles (all p > 0.05). Conclusions Correlation between BMO-MRW values and RNFL thickness differed significantly according to disc size. Thus, when we assess BMO-MRW in relation to RNFL thickness, disc size may need to be taken into consideration. | - |
| dc.format.extent | 9 | - |
| dc.language | 영어 | - |
| dc.language.iso | ENG | - |
| dc.publisher | NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP | - |
| dc.title | Effect of optic disc size on correlation between Bruch's membrane opening-minimum rim width and peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer thickness | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.publisher.location | 영국 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1038/s41433-019-0525-9 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85068660054 | - |
| dc.identifier.wosid | 000499652600016 | - |
| dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | EYE, v.33, no.12, pp 1930 - 1938 | - |
| dc.citation.title | EYE | - |
| dc.citation.volume | 33 | - |
| dc.citation.number | 12 | - |
| dc.citation.startPage | 1930 | - |
| dc.citation.endPage | 1938 | - |
| dc.type.docType | Article | - |
| dc.description.isOpenAccess | Y | - |
| dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | sci | - |
| dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
| dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
| dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Ophthalmology | - |
| dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Ophthalmology | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | NEURORETINAL RIM | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | TOMOGRAPHY | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | GLAUCOMA | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | HEAD | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Gyeongsang National University Central Library, 501, Jinju-daero, Jinju-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, 52828, Republic of Korea+82-55-772-0532
COPYRIGHT 2022 GYEONGSANG NATIONAL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.
