Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Clinical Usefulness of the QMAC-dRAST System for AmpC β-lactamase-Producing Enterobacteralesopen accessClinical Usefulness of the QMAC-dRAST System for AmpC β-lactamase-Producing Enterobacterales

Other Titles
Clinical Usefulness of the QMAC-dRAST System for AmpC β-lactamase-Producing Enterobacterales
Authors
최희강김대원권미정변정현진봉환홍기호이혁민용동은
Issue Date
Dec-2022
Publisher
대한임상미생물학회
Keywords
Keywords: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing; AmpC β-lactamase; Bacteremia
Citation
Annals of Clinical Microbiology, v.25, no.4, pp 115 - 125
Pages
11
Indexed
KCI
Journal Title
Annals of Clinical Microbiology
Volume
25
Number
4
Start Page
115
End Page
125
URI
https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/72511
DOI
10.5145/ACM.2022.25.4.1
ISSN
2288-0585
2288-6850
Abstract
Background: Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) is important for theappropriate treatment of bloodstream infections. The QMAC-dRAST system (QuantaMatrixInc., Korea) can directly perform RAST using positive blood culture samples with microscopicimaging. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the QMAC-dRAST system for AmpC-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales. Methods: Eighty isolates (20 Morganella morganii, 20 Serratia marcescens, 10 Klebsiellaaerogenes, 10 Enterobacter cloacae, and 20 Citrobacter freundii) and 14 antimicrobial agentswere included in the antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST). The performance of theQMAC-dRAST system was evaluated by simulating the clinical blood culturing process. Weconducted a comparative evaluation of the QMAC-dRAST and Vitek 2 systems (bioMérieux Inc.,France). Broth microdilution tests were performed as the reference method to resolve anydiscrepancies in the AST results between the two systems. Results: For 20 M. morganii and 20 S. marcescens, the categorical agreement (CA) betweenthe QMAC-dRAST and Vitek 2 systems increased from 55.4% to 83.8% after AST algorithmoptimization. Moreover, the discrepancy rates decreased as follows: from 19.1% to 5.4% verymajor errors (VME), from 38.3% to 4.3% major errors (ME), and from 14.6% to 12.1% minorerrors (mE) for the QMAC-dRAST system compared to the Vitek 2 system. For all 80 testedisolates, the QMAC-dRAST system showed 93.0% CA, 1.7% VME, 2.3% ME, and 4.9% mE. Conclusion: The QMAC-dRAST system was comparable to the Vitek 2 system after ASTalgorithm optimization for AmpC β-lactamase-producers, which are major pathogens andrequire time to express the enzyme. However, further modifications of the AST algorithm arestill warranted.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
ETC > Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE