Clinical Usefulness of the QMAC-dRAST System for AmpC β-lactamase-Producing Enterobacteralesopen accessClinical Usefulness of the QMAC-dRAST System for AmpC β-lactamase-Producing Enterobacterales
- Other Titles
- Clinical Usefulness of the QMAC-dRAST System for AmpC β-lactamase-Producing Enterobacterales
- Authors
- 최희강; 김대원; 권미정; 변정현; 진봉환; 홍기호; 이혁민; 용동은
- Issue Date
- Dec-2022
- Publisher
- 대한임상미생물학회
- Keywords
- Keywords: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing; AmpC β-lactamase; Bacteremia
- Citation
- Annals of Clinical Microbiology, v.25, no.4, pp 115 - 125
- Pages
- 11
- Indexed
- KCI
- Journal Title
- Annals of Clinical Microbiology
- Volume
- 25
- Number
- 4
- Start Page
- 115
- End Page
- 125
- URI
- https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/72511
- DOI
- 10.5145/ACM.2022.25.4.1
- ISSN
- 2288-0585
2288-6850
- Abstract
- Background: Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) is important for theappropriate treatment of bloodstream infections. The QMAC-dRAST system (QuantaMatrixInc., Korea) can directly perform RAST using positive blood culture samples with microscopicimaging. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the QMAC-dRAST system for AmpC-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales.
Methods: Eighty isolates (20 Morganella morganii, 20 Serratia marcescens, 10 Klebsiellaaerogenes, 10 Enterobacter cloacae, and 20 Citrobacter freundii) and 14 antimicrobial agentswere included in the antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST). The performance of theQMAC-dRAST system was evaluated by simulating the clinical blood culturing process. Weconducted a comparative evaluation of the QMAC-dRAST and Vitek 2 systems (bioMérieux Inc.,France). Broth microdilution tests were performed as the reference method to resolve anydiscrepancies in the AST results between the two systems.
Results: For 20 M. morganii and 20 S. marcescens, the categorical agreement (CA) betweenthe QMAC-dRAST and Vitek 2 systems increased from 55.4% to 83.8% after AST algorithmoptimization. Moreover, the discrepancy rates decreased as follows: from 19.1% to 5.4% verymajor errors (VME), from 38.3% to 4.3% major errors (ME), and from 14.6% to 12.1% minorerrors (mE) for the QMAC-dRAST system compared to the Vitek 2 system. For all 80 testedisolates, the QMAC-dRAST system showed 93.0% CA, 1.7% VME, 2.3% ME, and 4.9% mE.
Conclusion: The QMAC-dRAST system was comparable to the Vitek 2 system after ASTalgorithm optimization for AmpC β-lactamase-producers, which are major pathogens andrequire time to express the enzyme. However, further modifications of the AST algorithm arestill warranted.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - ETC > Journal Articles

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.