Cited 0 time in
하천 유량 및 수질 예측을 위한 머신러닝 알고리즘 성능 비교
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | 전기일 | - |
| dc.contributor.author | 권도혁 | - |
| dc.contributor.author | 기서진 | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-12-26T13:17:24Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-12-26T13:17:24Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1225-7192 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2289-0076 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/7248 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | This study was conducted to compare the predictive accuracy of three popular machine learning algorithms, i.e., Bayesian Regularized Neural Networks (BRNN), Neural Network (NN), and Support Vector Machines with Radial Basis Function Kernel (SVM), for modeling river water quality and quantity. Input data with 11 parameters collected from three monitoring sites in the lower part of the Nakdong River between January 2008 to December 2018 were input into the three algorithms. The data were divided into two subsets, which included a training data set and test data set in a ratio of 70:30. The results showed that NN displayed better performance in prediction accuracy than BRNN and SVM when optimizing one or two tuning parameters. The prediction accuracy was, on average, higher for chlorophyll a than for discharge, regardless of which machine learning algorithm was used. Identical results were also observed in the training data set. The two variables biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) played an important role in predicting chlorophyll a, whereas suspended solids (SS) was designated as the largest contributor for the prediction of discharge in all three algorithms. In terms of error metrics and performance indices such as root mean squared error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and R2, the three machine learning algorithms exhibited improved performance in the test data set, as compared to the training data set. We believe that this preliminary study helps identify suitable methods for enhanced prediction of emerging water quality or quantity parameters such as harmful algal blooms. | - |
| dc.format.extent | 9 | - |
| dc.language | 한국어 | - |
| dc.language.iso | KOR | - |
| dc.publisher | 한국수처리학회 | - |
| dc.title | 하천 유량 및 수질 예측을 위한 머신러닝 알고리즘 성능 비교 | - |
| dc.title.alternative | Comparing the Performance of Machine Learning Algorithms in Predicting River Water Quality and Quantity | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.publisher.location | 대한민국 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.17640/KSWST.2020.28.1.49 | - |
| dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | 한국수처리학회지, v.28, no.1, pp 49 - 57 | - |
| dc.citation.title | 한국수처리학회지 | - |
| dc.citation.volume | 28 | - |
| dc.citation.number | 1 | - |
| dc.citation.startPage | 49 | - |
| dc.citation.endPage | 57 | - |
| dc.identifier.kciid | ART002562464 | - |
| dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
| dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 기계학습 | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 예측 성능 | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 변수 중요도 | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 수질 | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 하천유량 | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Machine learning | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Predictive performance | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Variable importance | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Water quality | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Streamflow | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Gyeongsang National University Central Library, 501, Jinju-daero, Jinju-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, 52828, Republic of Korea+82-55-772-0532
COPYRIGHT 2022 GYEONGSANG NATIONAL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.
