Detailed Information

Cited 16 time in webofscience Cited 18 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Head-to-Head Comparison of 18F-Florbetaben and 18F-Flutemetamol in the Cortical and Striatal Regionsopen accessHead-to-Head Comparison of <SUP>18</SUP>F-Florbetaben and <SUP>18</SUP>F-Flutemetamol in the Cortical and Striatal Regions

Other Titles
Head-to-Head Comparison of <SUP>18</SUP>F-Florbetaben and <SUP>18</SUP>F-Flutemetamol in the Cortical and Striatal Regions
Authors
Cho, Soo HyunChoe, Yeong SimKim, Young JuKim, Hee JinJang, HyeminKim, YeshinKim, Si EunKim, Seung JooKim, Jun PyoJung, Young HeeKim, Byeong C.Lockhart, Samuel N.Farrar, GillNa, Duk L.Moon, Seung HwanSeo, Sang Won
Issue Date
Jun-2020
Publisher
IOS Press
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease; amyloid imaging; F-18-florbetaben; F-18-flutemetamol; head to head
Citation
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, v.76, no.1, pp 281 - 290
Pages
10
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Volume
76
Number
1
Start Page
281
End Page
290
URI
https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/72009
DOI
10.3233/JAD-200079
ISSN
1387-2877
1875-8908
Abstract
Background: F-18-florbetaben (FBB) and F-18-flutemetamol (FMM) amyloid PET have been developed and approved for clinical use. It is important to understand the distinct features of these ligands to compare and correctly interpret the results of different amyloid PET studies. Objective: We performed a head-to-head comparison of FBB and FMM to compare with regard to imaging characteristics, including dynamic range of retention, and differences in quantitative measurements between the two ligands in cortical, striatal, and white matter (WM) regions. Methods: Paired FBB and FMM PET images were acquired in 107 participants. Correlations of FBB and FMM amyloid deposition in the cortex, striatum, and WM were investigated and compared in different reference regions (cerebellar gray matter (CG), whole cerebellum (WC), WC with brainstem (WC + B), and pons). Results: The cortical SUVR (R-2 = 0.97) and striatal SUVR (R-2 = 0.95) demonstrated an excellent linear correlation between FBB and FMM using aWC as reference region. There was no difference in the cortical SUVR ratio between the two ligands (p = 0.90), but the striatal SUVR ratio was higher in FMM than in FBB (p < 0.001). Also, the effect size of differences in striatal SUVR seemed to be higher with FMM (2.61) than with FBB (2.34). These trends were similarly observed according to four different reference regions (CG, WC, WC+ B, and pons). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that FMM might be better than FBB to detect amyloid burden in the striatum, although both ligands are comparable for imaging AD pathology in vivo.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
ETC > Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE