Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 2 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Clinical Value of Single-Projection Angiography-Derived FFR in Noninfarct-Related Artery

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKwon, Woochan-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Ki Hong-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Seung Hun-
dc.contributor.authorHong, David-
dc.contributor.authorShin, Doosup-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Hyun Kuk-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Keun Ho-
dc.contributor.authorChoo, Eun Ho-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Chan Joon-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Min Chul-
dc.contributor.authorHong, Young Joon-
dc.contributor.authorAhn, Sung Gyun-
dc.contributor.authorDoh, Joon-Hyung-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Sang Yeub-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Sang Don-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Hyun-Jong-
dc.contributor.authorKang, Min Gyu-
dc.contributor.authorKoh, Jin-Sin-
dc.contributor.authorCho, Yun-Kyeong-
dc.contributor.authorNam, Chang-Wook-
dc.contributor.authorJoh, Hyun Sung-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Taek Kyu-
dc.contributor.authorYang, Jeong Hoon-
dc.contributor.authorSong, Young Bin-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Seung-Hyuk-
dc.contributor.authorJeong, Myung Ho-
dc.contributor.authorGwon, Hyeon-Cheol-
dc.contributor.authorHahn, Joo-Yong-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Joo Myung-
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-28T04:30:13Z-
dc.date.available2024-05-28T04:30:13Z-
dc.date.issued2024-05-
dc.identifier.issn1941-7640-
dc.identifier.issn1941-7632-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/70620-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The Murray law-based quantitative flow ratio (mu FR) is an emerging technique that requires only 1 projection of coronary angiography with similar accuracy to quantitative flow ratio (QFR). However, it has not been validated for the evaluation of noninfarct-related artery (non-IRA) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) settings. Therefore, our study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of mu FR and the safety of deferring non-IRA lesions with mu FR >0.80 in the setting of AMI. METHODS: mu FR and QFR were analyzed for non-IRA lesions of patients with AMI enrolled in the FRAME-AMI trial (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography-Guided Strategy for Management of Non-Infarction Related Artery Stenosis in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction), consisting of fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention and angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention groups. The diagnostic accuracy of mu FR was compared with QFR and FFR. Patients were classified by the non-IRA mu FR value of 0.80 as a cutoff value. The primary outcome was a vessel-oriented composite outcome, a composite of cardiac death, non-IRA-related myocardial infarction, and non-IRA-related repeat revascularization. RESULTS: mu FR and QFR analyses were feasible in 443 patients (552 lesions). mu FR showed acceptable correlation with FFR (R=0.777; P<0.001), comparable C-index with QFR to predict FFR <= 0.80 (mu FR versus QFR: 0.926 versus 0.961, P=0.070), and shorter total analysis time (mean, 32.7 versus 186.9 s; P<0.001). Non-IRA with mu FR >0.80 and deferred percutaneous coronary intervention had a significantly lower risk of vessel-oriented composite outcome than non-IRA with performed percutaneous coronary intervention (3.4% versus 10.5%; hazard ratio, 0.37 [95% CI, 0.14-0.99]; P=0.048). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with multivessel AMI, mu FR of non-IRA showed acceptable diagnostic accuracy comparable to that of QFR to predict FFR <= 0.80. Deferred non-IRA with mu FR >0.80 showed a lower risk of vessel-oriented composite outcome than revascularized non-IRA. REGISTRATION:URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02715518.-
dc.language영어-
dc.language.isoENG-
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins Ltd.-
dc.titleClinical Value of Single-Projection Angiography-Derived FFR in Noninfarct-Related Artery-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.publisher.location미국-
dc.identifier.doi10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013844-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85193476609-
dc.identifier.wosid001223620600008-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationCirculation: Cardiovascular Interventions, v.17, no.5, pp E013844-
dc.citation.titleCirculation: Cardiovascular Interventions-
dc.citation.volume17-
dc.citation.number5-
dc.citation.startPageE013844-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaCardiovascular System & Cardiology-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryCardiac & Cardiovascular Systems-
dc.subject.keywordPlusQUANTITATIVE FLOW RATIO-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusDIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusRANDOMIZED-TRIAL-
dc.subject.keywordPlusREVASCULARIZATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusRESERVE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPCI-
dc.subject.keywordPlusANGIOPLASTY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusLESION-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorcoronary angiography-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorfractional flow reserve, myocardial-
dc.subject.keywordAuthormyocardial infarction-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorpercutaneous coronary intervention-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medicine > Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE