Detailed Information

Cited 31 time in webofscience Cited 35 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Sensory Evaluation of Plant-Based Meat: Bridging the Gap with Animal Meat, Challenges and Future Prospects

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKumari, Swati-
dc.contributor.authorAlam, Amm Nurul-
dc.contributor.authorHossain, Md. Jakir-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Eun-Yeong-
dc.contributor.authorHwang, Young-Hwa-
dc.contributor.authorJoo, Seon-Tea-
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-29T07:00:30Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-29T07:00:30Z-
dc.date.issued2024-01-
dc.identifier.issn2304-8158-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/69441-
dc.description.abstractGlobally, the demand for plant-based meat is increasing rapidly as these products are becoming quite popular among vegans and vegetarians. However, its development is still in the early stage and faces various technological challenges; the imitation of the sensory profile of meat is the most challenging part as these products are meant to be an alternative to animal meat. The development of a product similar to meat requires accurate selection of ingredients and processing techniques. An understanding of the relevant sensory profile can help in constructing products and technologies that are consumer-centric and sustainable. In this review, we focus on the comparative differences in the sensory profiles of animal meat and plant-based meat alternatives, particularly regarding the color, texture, and flavor, along with the methods used to compare them. This paper also explains the sensory evaluation and how it affects consumer preference and acceptability. Additionally, a direction for further research on developing better plant-based meat products is suggested.-
dc.language영어-
dc.language.isoENG-
dc.publisherMDPI AG-
dc.titleSensory Evaluation of Plant-Based Meat: Bridging the Gap with Animal Meat, Challenges and Future Prospects-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.publisher.location스위스-
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/foods13010108-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85181932709-
dc.identifier.wosid001139179500001-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationFoods, v.13, no.1-
dc.citation.titleFoods-
dc.citation.volume13-
dc.citation.number1-
dc.type.docTypeReview-
dc.description.isOpenAccessY-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaFood Science & Technology-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryFood Science & Technology-
dc.subject.keywordPlusFUNCTIONAL-PROPERTIES-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCONTROLLED-RELEASE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSOY PROTEIN-
dc.subject.keywordPlusENCAPSULATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusANALOG-
dc.subject.keywordPlusALTERNATIVES-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPRODUCTS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCOOKING-
dc.subject.keywordPlusFLAVOR-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCOLOR-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorsensory evaluation methods-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorplant-based protein alternatives-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorconsumer acceptance-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorchallenges-
dc.subject.keywordAuthoranimal meat-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
ETC > Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE