Detailed Information

Cited 2 time in webofscience Cited 2 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Clinical performance of the STANDARD M10 SARS-CoV-2 rapid RT-PCR assay in patients visiting an emergency department

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorLee, Dong-hyun-
dc.contributor.authorHan, Eunhee-
dc.contributor.authorRyu, Soorack-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Hyuk joong-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Jieun-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Jinyeong-
dc.contributor.authorBae, Mi Hyun-
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-03T04:30:13Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-03T04:30:13Z-
dc.date.issued2023-12-
dc.identifier.issn0146-6615-
dc.identifier.issn1096-9071-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/69036-
dc.description.abstractIn emergency departments, rapid screening of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was important for arranging limited isolation resources and patient care during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. STANDARD M10 SARS-CoV-2 (SD Biosensor) is a recently developed cartridge-based RT-PCR that provides a turnaround time of 1 h, which is shorter than that for conventional RT-PCR. This study evaluated the clinical performance of STANDARD M10 in patients visiting an emergency department. From March to June 2022, two specimens were collected from patients visiting an emergency department. Each specimen comprised one nasopharyngeal and one oropharyngeal swab. Respective specimens underwent rapid RT-PCR using STANDARD M10 and conventional RT-PCR using Allplex SARS-CoV-2 (Seegene). When discordant results occurred, specimens undergoing the STANDARD M10 were retested with the Allplex to exclude specimen variations. Retest results replaced initial results of the Allplex. Clinical performance of STANDARD M10 was compared with Allplex. The study enrolled 1971 patients. COVID-19 prevalence was 6.2% based on the Allplex. Compared with the Allplex, overall agreement, positive percent agreement, and negative percent agreement of STANDARD M10 were 99.5% (95% CI: 99.1%–99.8%), 95.9% (95% CI: 90.8%–98.3%), and 99.8% (95% CI: 99.4%–99.9%), respectively. Nine discordant results were all positive on droplet digital PCR, except for one specimen that was positive with STANDARD M10. The STANDARD M10 showed reliable diagnostic performance for detecting SARS-CoV-2 from patients visiting in emergency departments and is a useful tool in emergency healthcare systems because of its easy-to-use cartridge-based assay and short resulting time for detecting SARS-CoV-2. © 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.-
dc.language영어-
dc.language.isoENG-
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons Inc.-
dc.titleClinical performance of the STANDARD M10 SARS-CoV-2 rapid RT-PCR assay in patients visiting an emergency department-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.publisher.location미국-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jmv.29330-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85180383389-
dc.identifier.wosid001138650800021-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJournal of Medical Virology, v.95, no.12-
dc.citation.titleJournal of Medical Virology-
dc.citation.volume95-
dc.citation.number12-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaVirology-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryVirology-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorAllplex-
dc.subject.keywordAuthoremergency department-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorrapid RT-PCR-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorSARS-CoV-2-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorSTANDARD M10-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
ETC > Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE