Concurrent laparoscopic highly selective vagotomy with closure of duodenal ulcer perforations show good clinical results as primary repair aloneopen access
- Authors
- Park, Ji-Ho; Lee, Jin-Kwon; Kim, Dong-Hwan; Min, Jae-Seok; Kim, Tae-Han; Jung, Eun-Jung; Park, Taejin; Jang, Jae Yool; Woo, Jung-Woo; Lee, Han Shin; Park, Miyeong; Jeong, Sang-Ho
- Issue Date
- Oct-2023
- Publisher
- Cambridge Medical Publications
- Keywords
- duodenal ulcer; Highly selective vagotomy; laparoscopy; safety; ulcer recurrence; vagotomy
- Citation
- Journal of International Medical Research, v.51, no.10, pp 3000605231206319
- Indexed
- SCIE
SCOPUS
- Journal Title
- Journal of International Medical Research
- Volume
- 51
- Number
- 10
- Start Page
- 3000605231206319
- URI
- https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/68317
- DOI
- 10.1177/03000605231206319
- ISSN
- 0300-0605
1473-2300
- Abstract
- OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical and operative results between laparoscopic primary repair (LPR) alone and LPR with highly selective vagotomy (LPR-HSV) in patients with duodenal ulcer perforation. METHODS: Clinical data from patients who underwent either LPR or LPR-HSV by resecting both sides of the neurovascular bundle using an ultrasonic or bipolar electrosurgical device for duodenal ulcer perforations, between 2010 and 2020, were retrospectively collected. Between-group differences in continuous and categorical variables were statistically analysed. RESULTS: Data from 184 patients (mean age, 49.6 years), who underwent either LPR (n = 132) or LPR-HSV (n = 52) were included. The mean operation time was significantly longer in the LPR-HSV group (116.5 ± 39.8 min) than in the LPR group (91.2 ± 33.3 min). Hospital stay was significantly shorter in the LPR-HSV group (8.6 ± 2.6 days) versus the LPR group (11.3 ± 7.1 days). The mean postoperative day of starting soft fluid diet was also significantly shorter in the LPR-HSV group (4.5 ± 1.4 days) than in the LPR group (5.6 ± 4 days). No between-group difference in morbidity rate was observed. The learning curve of the HSV procedure showed a stable procedure time after 10 operations. CONCLUSIONS: LPR with HSV may be a safe and feasible procedure for selective cases who are at high risk for ulcer recurrence.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - College of Medicine > Department of Medicine > Journal Articles

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.