Detailed Information

Cited 9 time in webofscience Cited 11 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Prediction of body composition in growing-finishing pigs using ultrasound based back-fat depth approach and machine learning algorithms

Authors
Basak, Jayanta KumarPaudel, BholaDeb, Nibas ChandraKang, Dae YeongMoon, Byeong EunAhmad Shahriar, ShihabKim, Hyeon Tae
Issue Date
Oct-2023
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Keywords
Fat free mass; Fat mass; Machine learning models; Non-invasive; Pigs
Citation
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, v.213
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
Volume
213
URI
https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/68033
DOI
10.1016/j.compag.2023.108269
ISSN
0168-1699
1872-7107
Abstract
Timely monitoring and precise estimation of body composition parameters, such as fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM), are crucial for pig production. Therefore, this study aimed to utilize three machine learning models, namely multiple linear regression (MLR), random forest regression (RFR), and support vector regression (SVR), to predict FM and FFM in growing-finishing pigs using four input combinations of three variables, i.e., mass of pigs, feed intake, and surface temperature of pigs. An ultrasound-based back-fat depth measurement approach was used to determine FM and FFM, and these measurements were compared with reference measurements obtained from slaughtered pigs. Data from two experimental periods in 2021 and 2022 were used for training and testing these models. Performance metrics, including the coefficient of determination (R2), root mean square error (RMSE), and mean absolute error (MAE), were used to evaluate the models' performance and stability. The results showed that the SVR model had the highest accuracy in predicting FM and FFM, with the ability to explain the relationship between input and target variables up to 94.4% in FM and 94.6% in FFM prediction. Additionally, the SVR model consistently outperformed the RFR and MLR models in predicting FM, with an increase in R2 of up to 6.72% and 27.96%, respectively, and a reduction in RMSE of up to 24.06% and 36.82%, respectively, across different input combinations. Similar results were obtained in FFM prediction, where the SVR model showed an increase in R2 of up to 6.47% and 22.45%, and a reduction in RMSE of up to 23.96% and 36.57% compared to RFR and MLR models, respectively. Moreover, the SVR model demonstrated the highest stability, with only 2.9% to 3.3% decrease in R2 during the testing phase compared to the training phase, while the RFR model exhibited the worst stability. Findings of the present study suggested that the SVR model was the most stable and reliable, along with the ultrasound-based back-fat depth approach for measuring FM and FFM in growing-finishing pigs. This approach could aid in monitoring meat quality and providing a rapid overview of body composition for pig farmers. © 2023 Elsevier B.V.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
농업생명과학대학 > 생물산업기계공학과 > Journal Articles
학과간협동과정 > 스마트팜학과 > Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Hyeon Tae photo

Kim, Hyeon Tae
농업생명과학대학 (생물산업기계공학과)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE