Detailed Information

Cited 19 time in webofscience Cited 22 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

QFR Assessment and Prognosis After Nonculprit PCI in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction

Authors
Lee, Seung HunHong, DavidShin, DoosupKim, Hyun KukPark, Keun HoChoo, Eun HoKim, Chan JoonKim, Min ChulHong, Young JoonAhn, Sung GyunDoh, Joon-HyungLee, Sang YeubPark, Sang DonLee, Hyun-JongKang, Min GyuKoh, Jin-SinCho, Yun-KyeongNam, Chang-WookJoh, Hyun SungChoi, Ki HongPark, Taek KyuYang, Jeong HoonSong, Young BinChoi, Seung-HyukJeong, Myung HoGwon, Hyeon-CheolHahn, Joo-YongLee, Joo Myung
Issue Date
Oct-2023
Publisher
Elsevier Inc.
Keywords
acute myocardial infarction; complete revascularization; fractional flow reserve; percutaneous coronary intervention; quantitative flow ratio
Citation
JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, v.16, no.19, pp 2365 - 2379
Pages
15
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume
16
Number
19
Start Page
2365
End Page
2379
URI
https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/68032
DOI
10.1016/j.jcin.2023.08.032
ISSN
1936-8798
1876-7605
Abstract
Background: Complete revascularization using either angiography-guided or fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided strategy can improve clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and multivessel disease. However, there is concern that angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may result in un-necessary PCI of the non–infarct-related artery (non-IRA), and its long-term prognosis is still unclear. Objectives: This study sought to evaluate clinical outcomes after non-IRA PCI according to the quantitative flow ratio (QFR). Methods: We performed post hoc QFR analysis of non-IRA lesions of AMI patients enrolled in the FRAME-AMI (FFR Versus Angiography-Guided Strategy for Management of AMI With Multivessel Disease) trial, which randomly allocated 562 patients into either FFR-guided PCI (FFR ≤0.80) or angiography-guided PCI (diameter stenosis >50%) for non-IRA lesions. Patients were classified by non-IRA QFR values into the QFR ≤0.80 and QFR >0.80 groups. The primary outcome was a major adverse cardiac event (MACE), a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization. Results: A total of 443 patients (552 lesions) were eligible for QFR analysis. Of 209 patients in the angiography-guided PCI group, 30.0% (n = 60) underwent non-IRA PCI despite having QFR >0.80 in the non-IRA. Conversely, only 2.7% (n = 4) among 209 patients in the FFR-guided PCI group had QFR >0.80 in the non-IRA. At a median follow-up of 3.5 years, the rate of MACEs was significantly higher among patients with non-IRA PCI despite QFR >0.80 than in patients with deferred PCI for non-IRA lesions (12.9% vs 3.1%; HR: 4.13; 95% CI: 1.10-15.57; P = 0.036). Non-IRA PCI despite QFR >0.80 was associated with a higher risk of non-IRA MACEs than patients with deferred PCI for non-IRA lesions (12.9% vs 2.1%; HR: 5.44; 95% CI: 1.13-26.19; P = 0.035). Conclusions: In AMI patients with multivessel disease, 30.0% of angiography-guided PCI resulted in un-necessary PCI for the non-IRA with QFR >0.80, which was significantly associated with an increased risk of MACEs than in those with deferred PCI for non-IRA lesions. (FFR Versus Angiography-Guided Strategy for Management of AMI With Multivessel Disease [FRAME-AMI] ClinicalTrials.gov number; NCT02715518) © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medicine > Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE