QFR Assessment and Prognosis After Nonculprit PCI in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction
- Authors
- Lee, Seung Hun; Hong, David; Shin, Doosup; Kim, Hyun Kuk; Park, Keun Ho; Choo, Eun Ho; Kim, Chan Joon; Kim, Min Chul; Hong, Young Joon; Ahn, Sung Gyun; Doh, Joon-Hyung; Lee, Sang Yeub; Park, Sang Don; Lee, Hyun-Jong; Kang, Min Gyu; Koh, Jin-Sin; Cho, Yun-Kyeong; Nam, Chang-Wook; Joh, Hyun Sung; Choi, Ki Hong; Park, Taek Kyu; Yang, Jeong Hoon; Song, Young Bin; Choi, Seung-Hyuk; Jeong, Myung Ho; Gwon, Hyeon-Cheol; Hahn, Joo-Yong; Lee, Joo Myung
- Issue Date
- Oct-2023
- Publisher
- Elsevier Inc.
- Keywords
- acute myocardial infarction; complete revascularization; fractional flow reserve; percutaneous coronary intervention; quantitative flow ratio
- Citation
- JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, v.16, no.19, pp 2365 - 2379
- Pages
- 15
- Indexed
- SCIE
SCOPUS
- Journal Title
- JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
- Volume
- 16
- Number
- 19
- Start Page
- 2365
- End Page
- 2379
- URI
- https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/68032
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.08.032
- ISSN
- 1936-8798
1876-7605
- Abstract
- Background: Complete revascularization using either angiography-guided or fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided strategy can improve clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and multivessel disease. However, there is concern that angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may result in un-necessary PCI of the non–infarct-related artery (non-IRA), and its long-term prognosis is still unclear. Objectives: This study sought to evaluate clinical outcomes after non-IRA PCI according to the quantitative flow ratio (QFR). Methods: We performed post hoc QFR analysis of non-IRA lesions of AMI patients enrolled in the FRAME-AMI (FFR Versus Angiography-Guided Strategy for Management of AMI With Multivessel Disease) trial, which randomly allocated 562 patients into either FFR-guided PCI (FFR ≤0.80) or angiography-guided PCI (diameter stenosis >50%) for non-IRA lesions. Patients were classified by non-IRA QFR values into the QFR ≤0.80 and QFR >0.80 groups. The primary outcome was a major adverse cardiac event (MACE), a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization. Results: A total of 443 patients (552 lesions) were eligible for QFR analysis. Of 209 patients in the angiography-guided PCI group, 30.0% (n = 60) underwent non-IRA PCI despite having QFR >0.80 in the non-IRA. Conversely, only 2.7% (n = 4) among 209 patients in the FFR-guided PCI group had QFR >0.80 in the non-IRA. At a median follow-up of 3.5 years, the rate of MACEs was significantly higher among patients with non-IRA PCI despite QFR >0.80 than in patients with deferred PCI for non-IRA lesions (12.9% vs 3.1%; HR: 4.13; 95% CI: 1.10-15.57; P = 0.036). Non-IRA PCI despite QFR >0.80 was associated with a higher risk of non-IRA MACEs than patients with deferred PCI for non-IRA lesions (12.9% vs 2.1%; HR: 5.44; 95% CI: 1.13-26.19; P = 0.035). Conclusions: In AMI patients with multivessel disease, 30.0% of angiography-guided PCI resulted in un-necessary PCI for the non-IRA with QFR >0.80, which was significantly associated with an increased risk of MACEs than in those with deferred PCI for non-IRA lesions. (FFR Versus Angiography-Guided Strategy for Management of AMI With Multivessel Disease [FRAME-AMI] ClinicalTrials.gov number; NCT02715518) © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - College of Medicine > Department of Medicine > Journal Articles

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.