Detailed Information

Cited 8 time in webofscience Cited 12 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Expert-level segmentation using deep learning for volumetry of polycystic kidney and liveropen access

Authors
Shin, Tae YoungKim, HyunsukLee, Joong-HyupChoi, Jong-SukMin, Hyun-SeokCho, HyungjooKim, KyungwookKang, GeonKim, JungkyuYoon, SieunPark, HyungyuHwang, Yeong UkKim, Hyo JinHan, MiyeunBae, EunjinYoon, Jong WooRha, Koon HoLee, Yong Seong
Issue Date
Nov-2020
Publisher
KOREAN UROLOGICAL ASSOC
Keywords
Artificial intelligence; Polycystic kidney diseases; Tomography
Citation
INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL UROLOGY, v.61, no.6, pp.555 - 564
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
KCI
Journal Title
INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL UROLOGY
Volume
61
Number
6
Start Page
555
End Page
564
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gnu/handle/sw.gnu/6036
DOI
10.4111/icu.20200086
ISSN
2466-0493
Abstract
Purpose: Volumetry is used in polycystic kidney and liver diseases (PKLDs), including autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), to assess disease progression and drug efficiency. However, since no rapid and accurate method for volumetry has been developed, volumetry has not yet been established in clinical practice, hindering the development of therapies for PKLD. This study presents an artificial intelligence (AI)-based volumetry method for PKLD. Materials and Methods: The performance of AI was first evaluated in comparison with ground-truth (GT). We trained a V-net-based convolutional neural network on 175 ADPKD computed tomography (CT) segmentations, which served as the GT and were agreed upon by 3 experts using images from 214 patients analyzed with volumetry. The dice similarity coefficient (DSC), interobserver correlation coefficient (ICC), and Bland-Altman plots of 39 GT and AI segmentations in the validation set were compared. Next, the performance of AI on the segmentation of 50 random CT images was compared with that of 11 PKLD specialists based on the resulting DSC and ICC. Results: The DSC and ICC of the AI were 0.961 and 0.999729, respectively. The error rate was within 3% for approximately 95% of the CT scans (error<1%, 46.2%; 1%<= error<3%, 48.7%). Compared with the specialists, AI showed moderate performance. Furthermore, an outlier in our results confirmed that even PKLD specialists can make mistakes in volumetry. Conclusions: PKLD volumetry using AI was fast and accurate. AI performed comparably to human specialists, suggesting its use may be practical in clinical settings.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medicine > Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Bae, Eun Jin photo

Bae, Eun Jin
의과대학 (의학과)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE