Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 2 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Clinical Outcomes of Intrascleral Fixation of Intraocular Lens Compared to Ciliary Sulcus Implantation and Transscleral Fixation

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorYoon, Eun Gyu-
dc.contributor.authorEom, Youngsub-
dc.contributor.authorWoo, Minji-
dc.contributor.authorJeon, Hyun Sun-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Seong-Jae-
dc.contributor.authorSong, Jong Suk-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Hyo Myung-
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-26T01:41:26Z-
dc.date.available2023-05-26T01:41:26Z-
dc.date.issued2023-04-
dc.identifier.issn1011-8942-
dc.identifier.issn2092-9382-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/59505-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To compare the clinical outcomes of intrascleral fixation of the three-piece intraocular lenses (IOLs) 2.5 mm posteri- or to the limbus with ciliary sulcus implantation and transscleral fixation 2.5 mm posterior to the limbus. Methods: Sixty-five eyes of 65 patients who underwent ciliary sulcus implantation or transscleral or intrascleral fixation of the AMO Sensar AR40e IOL were retrospectively reviewed. The postoperative refractive prediction error, back-calculated effective lens position (ELP), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and postoperative residual cylinder were compared. Results: There were significant differences in the median (interquartile range) postoperative refractive prediction error (diopters [D]) among the three groups (p < 0.001): for ciliary sulcus implantation (33 eyes), −0.89 D (−1.21 to −0.56 D); for transscleral fixation (10 eyes), −0.40 D (−0.78 to −0.22 D); and for intrascleral fixation (22 eyes), 0.01 D (−0.28 to 0.34 D). Significant differences (p < 0.001) were observed in the median back-calculated ELP: for ciliary sulcus implantation, 4.35 mm (3.95 to 4.55 mm); for transscleral fixation, 4.51 mm (4.34 to 4.76 mm); and for intrascleral fixation, 4.90 mm (4.56 to 5.35 mm). There were no differences in the median postoperative CDVA (0, 0.10, and 0 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution, respectively; p = 0.083) and the residual cylinder (−0.75, −1.50, and −0.63 D, respectively; p = 0.074) among three groups. Conclusions: Intrascleral fixation showed no myopic shift and the most posterior lens position, while ciliary sulcus implantation induced the greatest myopic shift and the most anterior lens position. However, there was no significant difference in the postoperative CDVA or astigmatism among the eyes with different IOL insertion methods, demonstrating good IOL stability and vision outcomes. © 2023 The Korean Ophthalmological Society.-
dc.format.extent9-
dc.language영어-
dc.language.isoENG-
dc.publisher대한안과학회-
dc.titleClinical Outcomes of Intrascleral Fixation of Intraocular Lens Compared to Ciliary Sulcus Implantation and Transscleral Fixation-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.publisher.location대한민국-
dc.identifier.doi10.3341/kjo.2022.0093-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85156267522-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationKorean Journal of Ophthalmology, v.37, no.2, pp 128 - 136-
dc.citation.titleKorean Journal of Ophthalmology-
dc.citation.volume37-
dc.citation.number2-
dc.citation.startPage128-
dc.citation.endPage136-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.identifier.kciidART002947858-
dc.description.isOpenAccessY-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClasskci-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorFixation-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorIntraocular lens-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorIntrascleral-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorSulcus-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorTransscleral-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medicine > Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Seong Jae photo

Kim, Seong Jae
의과대학 (의학과)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE