Detailed Information

Cited 63 time in webofscience Cited 72 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Evaluation of Rheological and Sensory Characteristics of Plant-Based Meat Analog with Comparison to Beef and Pork

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorBakhsh, Allah-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Se-Jin-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Eun-Yeong-
dc.contributor.authorHwang, Young-Hwa-
dc.contributor.authorJoo, Seon-Tea-
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-26T12:01:48Z-
dc.date.available2022-12-26T12:01:48Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.issn2636-0772-
dc.identifier.issn2636-0780-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/5725-
dc.description.abstractThis study explored the physicochemical, textural, and sensorial properties of a meat analog (MA) as compared to beef and pork meats. Results illustrate that MA patties had lower moisture, fat, and protein content, as well as higher ash and crude fiber than beef and pork. Likewise, MA patties had a higher pH, lightness (L*), and redness (a*) than either beef or pork. Pork meat exhibited the highest released water (RW) and cooking loss (CL) values, followed closely by MA with beef displaying the lowest values. Regardless of patty type, the post-cooking diameter patties were reduced significantly (p<0.05). However, the Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF), hardness, chewiness, and gumminess of beef were significantly higher than that of either pork or MA. The visible appearance of MA patties had more porous and loose structures before and after cooking. Consequently, based on sensory parameters, MA patties demonstrated the higher values for appearance and firmness, followed by beef and pork respectively, although the difference was not statistically significant. Therefore, the current study demonstrated that some physicochemical, textural, and sensory characteristics of beef and pork exhibited the most similarity to MA.-
dc.format.extent14-
dc.language영어-
dc.language.isoENG-
dc.publisherKOREAN SOC FOOD SCIENCE ANIMAL RESOURCES-
dc.titleEvaluation of Rheological and Sensory Characteristics of Plant-Based Meat Analog with Comparison to Beef and Pork-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.publisher.location대한민국-
dc.identifier.doi10.5851/kosfa.2021.e50-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85119205971-
dc.identifier.wosid000715753300006-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationFOOD SCIENCE OF ANIMAL RESOURCES, v.41, no.6, pp 983 - 996-
dc.citation.titleFOOD SCIENCE OF ANIMAL RESOURCES-
dc.citation.volume41-
dc.citation.number6-
dc.citation.startPage983-
dc.citation.endPage996-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.identifier.kciidART002770638-
dc.description.isOpenAccessY-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClasskci-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaFood Science & Technology-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryFood Science & Technology-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSOY PROTEIN-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES-
dc.subject.keywordPlusFAT-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCAPACITY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusQUALITY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPATTIES-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMETHYLCELLULOSE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusALTERNATIVES-
dc.subject.keywordAuthortextured vegetable protein-
dc.subject.keywordAuthormeat analog-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorbeef-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorpork-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorplant-based ingredients-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
ETC > Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Joo, Seon Tea photo

Joo, Seon Tea
대학원 (응용생명과학부)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE