Cited 7 time in
Reconstruction of remotely sensed daily evapotranspiration data in cloudy-sky conditions
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Song, Lisheng | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Bateni, Sayed M. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Xu, Yanhao | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Xu, Tongren | - |
| dc.contributor.author | He, Xinlei | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Ki, Seo Jin | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Liu, Shaomin | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Ma, Minguo | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Yang, Yang | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-12-26T10:00:57Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-12-26T10:00:57Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2021-09-01 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0378-3774 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1873-2283 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/3276 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | The unavailability of thermal infrared satellite observations in cloudy conditions has limited the spatial distribution and temporal coverage of remotely sensed evapotranspiration (ET) data. As a result, a number of approaches have been developed to reconstruct remotely sensed daily ET data in cloudy-sky conditions. Despite the wide application of these approaches, no work has been conducted to compare their performance over a wide variety of climatic and vegetative conditions. In this study, three commonly used ET reconstruction approaches namely, reference ET fraction (EToF), land surface temperature reconstruction (LSTR), and variational data assimilation (VDA) are used to obtain daily ET data under cloudy conditions. The abovementioned three approaches are applied to the Heihe River Basin (HRB) in the northwest of China during the growing season in 2015. The HRB covers an area of approximately 1,432,000 km2 and contains various land covers. The large aperture scintillometer (LAS) and eddy covariance (EC) measurements are used to evaluate performance of the abovementioned three methods over the grassland, cropland, and riparian forest sites in the HRB. The results show that the EToF approach underestimates ET at the grassland and riparian sites in cloudy days because of the negatively biased ET/ETo (where ETo is the reference evapotranspiration) in clear-sky days. The VDA approach overestimates ET in cloudy-sky conditions because of the overpredicted evaporative fraction values. The LSTR approach overestimates ET due to the under-reconstructed LST in cloudy day. The mean absolute percentage difference (MAPD) and root mean square error (RMSE) statistical metrics are used to compare performance of the three approaches The LSTR (MAPD = 43.1% and RMSE = 1.3 mm/day) and VDA (MAPD = 46.7% and RMSE = 1.4 mm/day) approaches slightly outperform EToF (MAPD = 46.6% and RMSE = 1.5 mm/day). The RMSEs of reconstructed ET values by EToF, VDA, and LSTR increase respectively from 1.6, 1.2, and 1.5 (mm/day) to 2.2, 1.9, and 2.0 (mm/day) as the number of consecutive cloudy days increases from 1 to 3. These outcomes suggest that synergistic use of space-borne microwave and thermal infrared LST observations into remote sensing-based ET methods can improve the reconstruction of ET data under cloudy conditions. | - |
| dc.language | 영어 | - |
| dc.language.iso | ENG | - |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier BV | - |
| dc.title | Reconstruction of remotely sensed daily evapotranspiration data in cloudy-sky conditions | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.publisher.location | 네델란드 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107000 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85107693821 | - |
| dc.identifier.wosid | 000687238900004 | - |
| dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Agricultural Water Management, v.255 | - |
| dc.citation.title | Agricultural Water Management | - |
| dc.citation.volume | 255 | - |
| dc.type.docType | Article | - |
| dc.description.isOpenAccess | Y | - |
| dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
| dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
| dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Agriculture | - |
| dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Water Resources | - |
| dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Agronomy | - |
| dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Water Resources | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | LAND-SURFACE TEMPERATURE | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | VARIATIONAL ASSIMILATION | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | ENERGY-BALANCE | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | FLUX | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | TRANSPIRATION | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | EVAPORATION | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Evapotranspiration | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Cloudy day reconstruction | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Remote sensing | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Gyeongsang National University Central Library, 501, Jinju-daero, Jinju-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, 52828, Republic of Korea+82-55-772-0532
COPYRIGHT 2022 GYEONGSANG NATIONAL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.
