Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

블록형 집합주택에 대한 인식과 만족도 비교 연구 - 우리나라 5층 이상 중정형 아파트를 중심으로 -A Comparative Study on the Perception and Satisfaction of Urban Block Housing-Focused on Court-yard Housing Apartment Consisting of More Than Five Stories in Korea

Other Titles
A Comparative Study on the Perception and Satisfaction of Urban Block Housing-Focused on Court-yard Housing Apartment Consisting of More Than Five Stories in Korea
Authors
Kim, N.-H.Ahn, J.-G.Bae, M.-C.
Issue Date
Oct-2022
Publisher
Architectural Institute of Korea
Keywords
Court-Yard Housing Apartment; Cross Tabulation Test; Non-Resident Perception; Resident Satisfaction; Urban Block Housing
Citation
Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, v.38, no.10, pp 197 - 206
Pages
10
Indexed
SCOPUS
KCI
Journal Title
Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea
Volume
38
Number
10
Start Page
197
End Page
206
URI
https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/29951
DOI
10.5659/JAIK.2022.38.10.197
ISSN
2733-6239
2733-6247
Abstract
This study aims to discover the differences between nonresident perception and resident satisfaction of urban block housing also known as court-yard housing. There was a tendency in recognizing that the dwelling qualities of urban block housing such as daylight, noise, and privacy were poor compared to grouped flats or grouped towers in Korea. This kind of perception was one of the main reasons why court-yard housing had not been widely adapted except for a few cases in Korea. This study objectifies the prejudice against them in the characteristics of units, courtyards, and neighborhood community streets through a survey conducted on a varied range of people related to building housing complexes; a cross-tabulation test was carried out to verify the homogeneity of these results. It was revealed that people were concerned about the shortage of daylight, but occupants were satisfied with the abundant sunlight made by the mid and low-rise buildings. People anticipated a lot of noise from the courtyard, but residents perceived that to be insignificant. On the contrary, the noise from the neighborhood community street was a real concern. People worried about the invasion of privacy and the closeness of a unit in court-yard housing, however tenants were insusceptible to privacy invasion and recognized the openness of a unit. People showed high expectation and gratification about the street-scope and shops in neighborhood community streets as an important social space for interactions. Consequently, it was confirmed that huge differences between perception and satisfaction of court-yard housing existed. It was inferred that the amenities in court-yard housing wasn’t necessarily sufficient amid the familiar circumstances of flats and towers. Negative opinions were being unconsciously reproduced by these social atmospheres that a house was considered more of an economic tool rather than a living space for both consumer and supplier. As a result of this study, the possibility of applying urban block housing or courtyard housing would be easier than before. Various sizes of housing blocks and styles of housing buildings strongly interacting with neighborhood community streets play a pivotal role in rehabilitating the public function of resident areas while vitalizing the community in its respective regions. © 2022, Architectural Institute of Korea. All rights reserved.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
공학계열 > 도시공학과 > Journal Articles
공과대학 > 도시공학과 > Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE