Cited 145 time in
Crude oil price prediction: A comparison between AdaBoost-LSTM and AdaBoost-GRU for improving forecasting performance
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Busari, Ganiyu Adewale | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Lim, Dong Hoon | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-12-26T09:45:41Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-12-26T09:45:41Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2021-12 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0098-1354 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1873-4375 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/2917 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Crude oil plays an important role in the world economy and contributes to more than one third of energy consumption worldwide. The better forecasting of its fluctuating price is crucial for policymaking. Although various methods had been previously applied for forecasting crude oil price which including both statistical models and Artificial Neural Network models but we find that there is no single paper that compares the AdaBoost-LSTM and AdaBoost-GRU models for improving forecasting performance. We proposed AdaBoost-GRU in which the GRU model was built, put inside sklearn wrapped and finally boost by AdaBoost Regressor. The predictive power of the proposed model was compared with AdaBoost-LSTM using daily Crude oil prices from October 23, 2009, to June 23, 2021, and single LSTM and single GRU were used as the benchmarking models. Forecasting performances were measured using five different metrics namely; the mean absolute error (MAE), the root mean squared error (RMSE), the Scatter Index (SI), the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), and the weighted mean absolute percentage error (WMAPE). We have demonstrated that the AdaBoost-LSTM and the AdaBoost-GRU models outperform the benchmarking models as expected, and the empirical results show that the AdaBoost-GRU is superior to all models studied in this research. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. | - |
| dc.language | 영어 | - |
| dc.language.iso | ENG | - |
| dc.publisher | Pergamon Press Ltd. | - |
| dc.title | Crude oil price prediction: A comparison between AdaBoost-LSTM and AdaBoost-GRU for improving forecasting performance | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.publisher.location | 영국 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2021.107513 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85114167602 | - |
| dc.identifier.wosid | 000703984100014 | - |
| dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Computers & Chemical Engineering, v.155 | - |
| dc.citation.title | Computers & Chemical Engineering | - |
| dc.citation.volume | 155 | - |
| dc.type.docType | Article | - |
| dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
| dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
| dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
| dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Computer Science | - |
| dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Engineering | - |
| dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications | - |
| dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Engineering, Chemical | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | ENSEMBLE APPROACH | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | MODELS | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Crude Oil Price Forecast | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | AdaBoost algorithm | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Long short-term memory | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Gated recurrent unit | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Forecasting | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Gyeongsang National University Central Library, 501, Jinju-daero, Jinju-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, 52828, Republic of Korea+82-55-772-0532
COPYRIGHT 2022 GYEONGSANG NATIONAL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.
