Cited 0 time in
딥러닝 알고리즘의 성능을 향상하기 위한 최적 모니터링 주기 결정: 남강 유역의 사례를 중심으로
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | 박현건 | - |
| dc.contributor.author | 서상익 | - |
| dc.contributor.author | 조경철 | - |
| dc.contributor.author | 기서진 | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-12-26T09:21:14Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-12-26T09:21:14Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2022-02 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1229-8425 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2635-7437 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/2532 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | The intention of this study is to address the effect of temporal resolution of input data on the prediction accuracy of deep learning algorithms. A popular watershed model Soil & Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) was used to generate time series of discharge and 9 water quality variables over different time intervals (i.e., 1, 2, 3, and 7 days) for three years (i.e., 2015-2017). We then assessed the performance of two deep learning algorithms, recurrent neural network (RNN) and gated recurrent unit (GRU), on those prepared data sets. Our finding showed that the prediction accuracy of the RNN algorithm increased progressively with the time resolution of input data from weekly data to daily data. The RNN also achieved its superior performance on the daily data, regardless of dependent variables. The only exception was the variable carbonaceous biochemical oxygen demand. When a comparison was made between those algorithms, the RNN algorithm was found to have slightly better accuracy than the GRU algorithm. Collectively, all these results revealed that the temporal resolution of input data was strongly responsible for changes in the performance of deep learning, specifically for those used in time series prediction. | - |
| dc.format.extent | 6 | - |
| dc.language | 한국어 | - |
| dc.language.iso | KOR | - |
| dc.publisher | 한국환경기술학회 | - |
| dc.title | 딥러닝 알고리즘의 성능을 향상하기 위한 최적 모니터링 주기 결정: 남강 유역의 사례를 중심으로 | - |
| dc.title.alternative | Determining the Optimal Monitoring Frequency for Improving the Performance of Deep Learning Algorithms: A Case Study in the Nam River Basin | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.publisher.location | 대한민국 | - |
| dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | 한국환경기술학회지, v.23, no.1, pp 41 - 46 | - |
| dc.citation.title | 한국환경기술학회지 | - |
| dc.citation.volume | 23 | - |
| dc.citation.number | 1 | - |
| dc.citation.startPage | 41 | - |
| dc.citation.endPage | 46 | - |
| dc.identifier.kciid | ART002815901 | - |
| dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
| dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Temporal resolution | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Recurrent neural network | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Gated recurrent unit | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Time series | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | SWAT | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Environmental impact | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Gyeongsang National University Central Library, 501, Jinju-daero, Jinju-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, 52828, Republic of Korea+82-55-772-0532
COPYRIGHT 2022 GYEONGSANG NATIONAL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.
