Cited 74 time in
Predictor selection for downscaling GCM data with LASSO
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Hammami, Dorra | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Lee, Tae Sam | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Ouarda, Taha B. M. J. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Lee, Jonghyun | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-12-27T01:38:03Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-12-27T01:38:03Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2012-09-14 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2169-897X | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2169-8996 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/22018 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Over the last 10 years, downscaling techniques, including both dynamical (i.e., the regional climate model) and statistical methods, have been widely developed to provide climate change information at a finer resolution than that provided by global climate models (GCMs). Because one of the major aims of downscaling techniques is to provide the most accurate information possible, data analysts have tried a number of approaches to improve predictor selection, which is one of the most important steps in downscaling techniques. Classical methods such as regression techniques, particularly stepwise regression (SWR), have been employed for downscaling. However, SWR presents some limits, such as deficiencies in dealing with collinearity problems, while also providing overly complex models. Thus, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) technique, which is a penalized regression method, is presented as another alternative for predictor selection in downscaling GCM data. It may allow for more accurate and clear models that can properly deal with collinearity problems. Therefore, the objective of the current study is to compare the performances of a classical regression method (SWR) and the LASSO technique for predictor selection. A data set from 9 stations located in the southern region of Quebec that includes 25 predictors measured over 29 years (from 1961 to 1990) is employed. The results indicate that, due to its computational advantages and its ease of implementation, the LASSO technique performs better than SWR and gives better results according to the determination coefficient and the RMSE as parameters for comparison. | - |
| dc.language | 영어 | - |
| dc.language.iso | ENG | - |
| dc.publisher | AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION | - |
| dc.title | Predictor selection for downscaling GCM data with LASSO | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.publisher.location | 미국 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1029/2012JD017864 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-84866690689 | - |
| dc.identifier.wosid | 000308892800002 | - |
| dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, v.117 | - |
| dc.citation.title | JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES | - |
| dc.citation.volume | 117 | - |
| dc.type.docType | Article | - |
| dc.description.isOpenAccess | Y | - |
| dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
| dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences | - |
| dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | VARIABLE SELECTION | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | REGRESSION | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | SHRINKAGE | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Gyeongsang National University Central Library, 501, Jinju-daero, Jinju-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, 52828, Republic of Korea+82-55-772-0532
COPYRIGHT 2022 GYEONGSANG NATIONAL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.
