Cited 0 time in
Effect of different CT scanner types and beam collimations on measurements of three-dimensional volume and hounsfield units of artificial calculus phantom
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Wang, J. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Lee, H. | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-12-27T00:05:11Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-12-27T00:05:11Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2014 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1598-298X | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/20162 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | The objective of this study was to evaluate the differences and reproducibility of Hounsfield unit (HU) value and volume measurements on different computed tomography (CT) scanner types and different collimations by using a gelatin phantom. The phantom consisting of five synthetic simulated calculus spanning diameters from 3.0 mm to 12.0 mm with 100 HU was scanned using a two-channel multi-detector row CT (MDCT) scanner, a four- channel MDCT scanner, and two 64-channel MDCT scanners. For all different scanner types, the thinnest possible collimation and the second thinnest collimation was used. The HU values and volumes of the synthetic simulated calculus were independently measured three times with minimum intervals of 2 weeks and by three experienced veterinary radiologists. ANOVA and Scheff? test for the multiple comparison were performed for statistical comparison of the HU values and volumes of the synthetic simulated calculus according to different CT scanner types and different collimations. The reproducibility of the HU value and volume measurements was determined by calculating Cohen’s k. The reproducibility of HU value and volume measurements was very good. HU value varied between different CT scanner types, among different beam collimations. However, there was not statistically significant difference. The percent error (PE) decreased as the collimation thickness decreased, but the decrease was statistically insignificant. In addition, no statistically significant difference in the PEs of the different CT scanner types was found. It can be concluded that the CT scanner type insignificantly affects HU value and the volumetric measurement, but that a thinner collimation tends to be more useful for accurate volumetric measurement. ? 2014, Korean Society of Veterinary Clinics. All rights reserved. | - |
| dc.format.extent | 7 | - |
| dc.language | 영어 | - |
| dc.language.iso | ENG | - |
| dc.publisher | Korean Society of Veterinary Clinics | - |
| dc.title | Effect of different CT scanner types and beam collimations on measurements of three-dimensional volume and hounsfield units of artificial calculus phantom | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.publisher.location | 대한민국 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.17555/ksvc.2014.12.31.6.495 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-84923177081 | - |
| dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Journal of Veterinary Clinics, v.31, no.6, pp 495 - 501 | - |
| dc.citation.title | Journal of Veterinary Clinics | - |
| dc.citation.volume | 31 | - |
| dc.citation.number | 6 | - |
| dc.citation.startPage | 495 | - |
| dc.citation.endPage | 501 | - |
| dc.type.docType | Article | - |
| dc.identifier.kciid | ART001945093 | - |
| dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
| dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
| dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Computed tomography | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Hounsfield unit | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Phantom | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Volume measurement | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Gyeongsang National University Central Library, 501, Jinju-daero, Jinju-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, 52828, Republic of Korea+82-55-772-0532
COPYRIGHT 2022 GYEONGSANG NATIONAL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.
