Detailed Information

Cited 1 time in webofscience Cited 1 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Predictors of revisit and admission after discharge from an emergency department in acute pyelonephritis

Authors
Kang, C.Kim, K.Lee, J. H.Jo, Y. H.Park, J. W.Lee, S. H.Kim, Y. J.Rhee, J. E.Kim, D. H.
Issue Date
May-2015
Publisher
SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
Keywords
Albumins; C-reactive protein; logistic models; patient readmission; risk assessment
Citation
HONG KONG JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, v.22, no.3, pp 154 - 162
Pages
9
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
HONG KONG JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Volume
22
Number
3
Start Page
154
End Page
162
URI
https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/17265
DOI
10.1177/102490791502200304
ISSN
1024-9079
2309-5407
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of this study is to construct clinical prediction models to predict emergency department (ED) return visit following initial discharge for acute pyelonephritis (APN) and the need for hospital readmission upon ED return visits. Method: A retrospective analysis included 1250 discharged women with APN. Independent risk factors for revisit and subsequent admission after revisit were determined by multivariate analysis, and a prediction model for revisit and subsequent admission after revisit was constructed. Results: Independent risk factors for revisit were nausea (2 points), age >= 65 years (2 points), C-reactive protein >20 mg/dL (2 points), serum albumin <3.3 g/dL (3 points) and urine white blood cell count >= 30/high power field (2 points). Re-visit risk scores were categorised to five groups and the re-visit rate was 5.4%, 8.6%, 12.2%, 19.1% and 43.8%, respectively, showing an area under curve (AUC) of 0.62. Risk factors for subsequent admission after revisit were vomiting (1 point), hypertension (2 points), serum creatinine >1.5 mg/dL (2 points), C-reactive protein >20 mg/dL (2 points) and serum albumin <3.3 g/dL (4 points). The subsequent admission after revisit risk scores were classified to three groups and subsequent admission after revisit rate was 3.5%, 15.0%, and 38.2%, respectively. Conclusion: The developed model can identify a group of patients at high risk for a return visit and for requiring subsequent hospital admission, and might be used to improve initial disposition decision and discharge instructions.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medicine > Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE