Detailed Information

Cited 8 time in webofscience Cited 11 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

A Randomized, Double-blind, Candesartan-controlled, Parallel Group Comparison Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Antihypertensive Efficacy and Safety of Fimasartan in Patients with Mild to Moderate Essential Hypertension

Authors
Lee, Jang HoonYang, Dong HeonHwang, Jin YongHur, Seung HoCha, Tae JoonKim, Ki-SikKim, Moo HyunChun, Kook JinCha, Gwang SooHong, Geu RuLee, Sang GonKim, Dong SooKim, Doo IlChae, Shung Chull
Issue Date
Jun-2016
Publisher
ELSEVIER
Keywords
angiotensin receptor blocker; candesartan; fimasartan; hypertension
Citation
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, v.38, no.6, pp 1485 - 1497
Pages
13
Indexed
SCI
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS
Volume
38
Number
6
Start Page
1485
End Page
1497
URI
https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/15431
DOI
10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.04.005
ISSN
0149-2918
1879-114X
Abstract
Purpose: A new antihypertensive drug that selectively blocks angiotensin II receptor type 1, fimasartan, has a potent and rapidly acting antihypertensive effect. We investigated the antihypertensive effects of fimasartan 60 and 120 mg and its safety in comparison to 8 mg of candesartan. Methods: This clinical trial is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active comparator, and parallel group study. Three hundred sixty-two individuals were screened, and 290 patients aged 19 to 75 years with mild to moderate hypertension (diastolic blood pressure [DBP], 90-110 mm Hg) were randomly assigned to 60 to 120 mg/d of fimasartan or 8 mg/d of candesartan after a 2-week placebo run-in period. Treatments were administered for 12 weeks without dosage adjustment. The primary end point was the differences in DBP changes at week 12. Findings: After 12 weeks of treatment, DBP and systolic blood pressure (SBP) decreased significantly in all 3 groups. The decrease in DBP at week 12 was larger but not statistically significant in the fimasartan 60 mg compared with the candesartan 8 mg group with a mean (SD) difference of 1.72 (8.32) mm Hg (95% CI, -0.71 to 4.15 mm Hg; P = 0.17). The lower margin of the CI (-0.71 mm Hg) exceeded the noninferiority margin (-3.5 mm Hg). The DBP-lowering effect of fimasartan 120 mg was also non significantly larger than candesartan 8 mg (difference, 1.58 [8.27] mm Hg; P = 0.20). The decrease in SBP was also nonsignificantly larger in the fimasartan 60 mg group compared with the candesartan 8 mg group (difference, 3.50 [12.63] mm Hg; P = .06). The SBP-lowering effect of fimasartan 120 mg was statistically larger than candesartan 8 mg (difference, 4.98 [13.99] mm Hg; P = .02). Response rate (DBP <90 mm Hg or DBP lowering >10 mm Hg at week 12) was also nonsignificantly greater in both fimasartan groups (Fimasartan 60 mg, 81%; fimasartan 120 mg, 72%; candesartan 8 mg, 71%). The safety profile of the fimasartan 60 mg and 120 mg was similar to candesartan 8 mg, with a slightly higher, but statistically not significant, incidence of hepatic enzyme elevation in fimasartan 120 mg. Implications: The antihypertensive effect of fimasartan, a newly available angiotensin II receptor type 1 blocker, is comparable, although not superior, to candesartan with a good safety profile. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01135212. (C) 2016 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc, All rights reserved.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medicine > Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Hwang, Jin Yong photo

Hwang, Jin Yong
의과대학 (의학과)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE