Detailed Information

Cited 34 time in webofscience Cited 37 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Registered nurses' clinical reasoning skills and reasoning process: A think-aloud study

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorLee, JuHee-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Young Joo-
dc.contributor.authorBae, JuYeon-
dc.contributor.authorSeo, Minjeong-
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-26T20:01:18Z-
dc.date.available2022-12-26T20:01:18Z-
dc.date.issued2016-11-
dc.identifier.issn0260-6917-
dc.identifier.issn1532-2793-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/15163-
dc.description.abstractBackground: As complex chronic diseases are increasing, nurses' prompt and accurate clinical reasoning skills are essential. However, little is known about the reasoning skills of registered nurses. Objective: This study aimed to determine how registered nurses use their dinical reasoning skills and to identify how the reasoning process proceeds in the complex clinical situation of hospital setting. Design: A qualitative exploratory design was used with a think-aloud method. Methods: A total of 13 registered nurses (mean years of experience = 11.4) participated in the study, solving an ill-structured clinical problem based on complex chronic patients cases in a hospital setting. Data were analyzed using deductive content analysis. Results: Findings showed that the registered nurses used a variety of clinical reasoning skills. The most commonly used skill was 'checking accuracy and reliability.' The reasoning process of registered nurses covered assessment, analysis, diagnosis, planning/implementation, and evaluation phase. Conclusions: It is critical that registered nurses apply appropriate clinical reasoning skills in complex clinical practice. The main focus of registered nurses' reasoning in this study was assessing a patient's health problem, and their reasoning process was cyclic, rather than linear. There is a need for educational strategy development to enhance registered nurses' competency in determining appropriate interventions in a timely and accurate fashion. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.-
dc.format.extent6-
dc.language영어-
dc.language.isoENG-
dc.publisherCHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE-
dc.titleRegistered nurses' clinical reasoning skills and reasoning process: A think-aloud study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.publisher.location스코트랜드-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.nedt.2016.08.017-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84985910981-
dc.identifier.wosid000386191400013-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationNURSE EDUCATION TODAY, v.46, pp 75 - 80-
dc.citation.titleNURSE EDUCATION TODAY-
dc.citation.volume46-
dc.citation.startPage75-
dc.citation.endPage80-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassssci-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaEducation & Educational Research-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaNursing-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryEducation, Scientific Disciplines-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryNursing-
dc.subject.keywordPlusNURSING-STUDENTS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusJUDGMENT-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMODEL-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorContent analysis-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorClinical reasoning-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorRegistered nurses-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorThink-aloud-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
간호대학 > Department of Nursing > Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE