Applicability Evaluation of Landslide Vulnerability Criteria for Decision on Landcreep-Vulnerable Areas in South Korea
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Park, Jae-Hyeon | - |
dc.contributor.author | Park, Seong-Gyun | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Hyun | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-12-26T07:20:50Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-12-26T07:20:50Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022-04 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2071-1050 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2071-1050 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/1467 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Landcreep, which is a natural hazard, frequently occurs in South Korea. However, despite many differences between general landslides and landcreep, landcreep is still treated as a kind of landslide. A bigger problem in this reality is that no verification has been made on whether the national landslide vulnerability criteria can be applied to the decision on landcreep-vulnerable areas. Therefore, this study was conducted to examine the applicability of the landslide vulnerability criteria for the decision on landcreep-vulnerable areas. For verification, first, as a result of a correlation analysis that extracted seven types of geomorphological environment criteria that are used in deciding landslide-vulnerable areas from 57 landcreep areas, a positive correlation was shown only in the slope type and the parent rock. Second, as a result of the evaluation of the landcreep area by applying the landslide vulnerability criteria, it was analyzed that 61.4% were areas with low or no possibility of the occurrence of landslides. Third, on the basis of the overlapping analysis of the landslide hazard map and landcreep areas, 67.6% were in Level 3 or lower, except for Levels 1 and 2, which had high hazards, and 21.5% were landcreep areas that were not included in the hazard levels. Applying the landslide vulnerability criteria for deciding on landcreep-vulnerable areas is not appropriate, and it is urgent to prepare landcreep vulnerability criteria. | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | ENG | - |
dc.publisher | MDPI | - |
dc.title | Applicability Evaluation of Landslide Vulnerability Criteria for Decision on Landcreep-Vulnerable Areas in South Korea | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.publisher.location | 스위스 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/su14084447 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85128447925 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000786253300001 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | SUSTAINABILITY, v.14, no.8 | - |
dc.citation.title | SUSTAINABILITY | - |
dc.citation.volume | 14 | - |
dc.citation.number | 8 | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | Y | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | ssci | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Science & Technology - Other Topics | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Environmental Sciences & Ecology | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Green & Sustainable Science & Technology | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Environmental Sciences | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Environmental Studies | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | SOIL-CREEP | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | DYNAMICS | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | landcreep | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | landslide | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | vulnerability criteria | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | slope type | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | parent rock | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Gyeongsang National University Central Library, 501, Jinju-daero, Jinju-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, 52828, Republic of Korea+82-55-772-0533
COPYRIGHT 2022 GYEONGSANG NATIONAL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.