Detailed Information

Cited 66 time in webofscience Cited 71 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

The new trauma score (NTS): a modification of the revised trauma score for better trauma mortality predictionopen access

Authors
Jeong, Jin HeePark, Yong JooKim, Dong HoonKim, Tae YunKang, ChangwooLee, Soo HoonLee, Sang BongKim, Seong ChunLim, Daesung
Issue Date
3-Jul-2017
Publisher
BMC
Keywords
Trauma severity indices; Injury severity score; Emergency department
Citation
BMC SURGERY, v.17
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
BMC SURGERY
Volume
17
URI
https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/13601
DOI
10.1186/s12893-017-0272-4
ISSN
1471-2482
Abstract
Background: Since its introduction, the Revised Trauma Score (RTS) has been widely used to determine the prognosis of trauma patients. Recent studies have revealed a need to change the parameters of the RTS. We have designed a new trauma score (NTS) based on revised parameters, including the adoption of the actual Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score instead of a GCS code, the revision of the systolic blood pressure interval used for the code value and the incorporation of peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) instead of respiratory rate. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the predictive performance of the NTS for in-hospital mortality compared with the RTS and other trauma scores. Methods: This was a prospective observational study using data from the trauma registry of a tertiary hospital. The subjects were selected from patients who arrived at the ED between July 1, 2014, and June 30, 2016, and, for external validation purposes, those who arrived at the ED between July 1, 2011, and June 30, 2013. Demographic data and physiological data were analyzed. NTS models were calculated using logistic regression for GCS score, SBP code values, and SpO2. The mortality predictive performance of NTS was compared with that of other trauma scores. Results: A total of 3263 patients for derivation and 3106 patients for validation were included in the analysis. The NTS showed better discrimination than the RTS (AUC = 0.935 vs. 0.917, respectively, AUC difference = 0.018, p = 0.001; 95% CI, 0.0071-0.0293) and similar discrimination to that of mechanism, Glasgow Coma scale, age, and arterial pressure (MGAP) and the Glasgow Coma Scale, age, and systolic arterial pressure (GAP). In the validation cohort, the global properties of the NTS for mortality prediction were significantly better than those of the RTS (AUC = 0.919 vs. 0.906, respectively; AUC difference = 0.013, p = 0.013; 95% CI, 0.0009-0.0249) and similar to those of the MGAP and GAP. Conclusions: The NTS predicts in-hospital mortality substantially better than the RTS.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medicine > Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE