Cited 18 time in
Evaluating a tax-based subsidy approach for forest carbon sequestration
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Cho, Seong-Hoon | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Lee, Juhee | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Roberts, Roland K. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | English, Burton C. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Yu, Edward T. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Kim, Taeyoung | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Armsworth, Paul R. | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-12-26T18:33:33Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-12-26T18:33:33Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2017-09 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0376-8929 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1469-4387 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/13510 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Forest carbon sequestration plays an important role in reducing the build-up of greenhouse gases that are known to contribute to global climate change. However, private landowners will supply less carbon sequestration than would be socially desirable if they are unable to capture the economic value of sequestration. We examine the viability of offering landowners property tax subsidies for forest carbon sequestration (referred to as a 'tax-based subsidy approach'). Waiving property taxes on forestland provides incentives for landowners to afforest non-forested land and/or sustain forests that are at risk of deforestation. We focus on 17 Tennessee counties and one Kentucky county, constituting one of 179 Bureau of Economic Analysis areas in the United States, as a case study. Higher forestland net return from waiving property taxes increases the share of forestland in the 18 counties, which in turn increases the accumulation of carbon in the forest ecosystem, suggesting that this is a viable approach. The annualized county-level cost of supplying forest carbon sequestration using a tax-based subsidy ranges between US$15.56 and US$563.58 per carbon tonne across the 18 counties. Relevant government agencies can use these estimates to target selected counties for more cost-effective adoption of the county-level tax-based subsidy approach. | - |
| dc.format.extent | 10 | - |
| dc.language | 영어 | - |
| dc.language.iso | ENG | - |
| dc.publisher | Cambridge University Press | - |
| dc.title | Evaluating a tax-based subsidy approach for forest carbon sequestration | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.publisher.location | 미국 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1017/S0376892917000078 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85015105236 | - |
| dc.identifier.wosid | 000408065700004 | - |
| dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Environmental Conservation, v.44, no.3, pp 234 - 243 | - |
| dc.citation.title | Environmental Conservation | - |
| dc.citation.volume | 44 | - |
| dc.citation.number | 3 | - |
| dc.citation.startPage | 234 | - |
| dc.citation.endPage | 243 | - |
| dc.type.docType | Article | - |
| dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
| dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | sci | - |
| dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
| dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
| dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Biodiversity & Conservation | - |
| dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Environmental Sciences & Ecology | - |
| dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Biodiversity Conservation | - |
| dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Environmental Sciences | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | LAND-USE CHANGE | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | SEQUESTERING CARBON | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | COSTS | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | forest carbon sequestration | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | incentive payment | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | tax-based subsidy | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Gyeongsang National University Central Library, 501, Jinju-daero, Jinju-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, 52828, Republic of Korea+82-55-772-0532
COPYRIGHT 2022 GYEONGSANG NATIONAL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.
