Cited 11 time in
Factors that Influence Sample Adequacy in Liquid-Based Cytology after Ultrasonography-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Thyroid Nodules: A Single-Center Study
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Lee, Yoo Jin | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Kim, Dong Wook | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Jung, Soo Jin | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Baek, Hye Jin | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-12-26T18:17:54Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-12-26T18:17:54Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0001-5547 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1938-2650 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/13200 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Objective: The factors that influence the acquisition of adequate samples during liquid-based cytology (LBC) remain unclear. This study aimed to identify factors that affect cytological adequacy in LBC after ultrasonography (US)-guided fine-needle aspiration (US-FNA) of thyroid nodules. Study Design: From January 2017 to May 2017, a single radiologist performed US-FNA to diagnose 112 thyroid nodules in 112 consecutive patients. Based on US findings after US-FNA, the size, location, position, composition, calcification, and vascularity of each nodule, as well as the US-based diagnosis, were investigated by the same radiologist. Blinded to US information, a single cytopathologist investigated cytological adequacy, cytological cellularity, and Bethesda category. Results: Of the 112 thyroid nodules, cytological adequacy was achieved in 91.1% (102/112). Thyroid nodules with sizes >= 20 mm or those that were predominantly cystic showed a high-er rate of cytological inadequacy (p < 0.05). Thyroid nodule location, position, calcification status, and vascularity did not influence cytological adequacy, nor did US-based diagnosis (p > 0.05). Nodule composition or calcification significantly influenced cytological cellularity (p < 0.05), whereas nodule size, location, position, vascularity, and US-based diagnosis did not (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Most investigated factors did not influence cytological adequacy or cellularity. (c) 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel | - |
| dc.language | 영어 | - |
| dc.language.iso | ENG | - |
| dc.publisher | KARGER | - |
| dc.title | Factors that Influence Sample Adequacy in Liquid-Based Cytology after Ultrasonography-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Thyroid Nodules: A Single-Center Study | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.publisher.location | 스위스 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1159/000486442 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85041011410 | - |
| dc.identifier.wosid | 000440780900003 | - |
| dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | ACTA CYTOLOGICA, v.62, no.4 | - |
| dc.citation.title | ACTA CYTOLOGICA | - |
| dc.citation.volume | 62 | - |
| dc.citation.number | 4 | - |
| dc.type.docType | Article | - |
| dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
| dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
| dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | esci | - |
| dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Pathology | - |
| dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Pathology | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | SCIENCE CONFERENCE | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | BIOPSY | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | FNA | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | EXPERIENCE | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | SYNOPSIS | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | CRITERIA | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | STATE | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | SIZE | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Thyroid nodule | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Fine-needle aspiration | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Liquid-based cytology | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Adequacy | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Cellularity | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Gyeongsang National University Central Library, 501, Jinju-daero, Jinju-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, 52828, Republic of Korea+82-55-772-0532
COPYRIGHT 2022 GYEONGSANG NATIONAL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.
