Cited 0 time in
산불 훼손 복원지 내 토양개량제 처리가 Wood stakes의 탄소 및 질소 동태에 미치는 영향
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | 박성완 | - |
| dc.contributor.author | 백경원 | - |
| dc.contributor.author | 변희섭 | - |
| dc.contributor.author | 김용석 | - |
| dc.contributor.author | 김춘식 | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-12-26T18:02:42Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-12-26T18:02:42Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2018-12 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1229-5671 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2288-1859 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/12918 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 본 연구는 울산광역시 봉대산 산불 훼손 복원지를 대상으로 토양개량제 처리가 토양층에 매설된 wood stakes의 분해율과 유기 탄소 및 질소 동태에 미치는 영향을 조사하기 위하여 실시하였다. 산불 훼손 복원지에 식재된 튤립나무, 상수리나무, 왕벚나무, 곰솔 조림지와 미복원지를 대상으로 2015년 3월 토양 0∼15cm 깊이에 wood stakes를 매설한 후, 2년 동안 각 1회씩 토양개량제(CLB: 복합비료 + 석회 + 목탄 처리구; LB: 석회 + 목탄 처리구)를 처리하고, 2015년 10월, 2016년 3월, 2016년 10월 채취하여 분해율과 유기 탄소 및 질소 농도를 조사하였다. Wood stakes 분해율의 경우 토양개량제 처리구와 대조구 사이에 유의적인 차이는 없었으나, 유기 탄소 잔존율의 경우 대조구(43.7%), CLB처리구(71.3%), LB처리구(71.6%) 순으로 토양개량제 처리구의 탄소 무기화가 대조구에 비해 낮게 나타났다. Wood stakes 내 질소 잔존율의 경우도 대조구가 29.7%로 LB처리구 52.6%에 비해 낮아 탄소무기화율과 유사한 경향을 보였다. 본 연구결과에 따르면 산불 훼손 복원지에 토양개량제 처리는 wood stakes의 탄소 및 질소 무기화를 지연하는 것으로 나타났다. | - |
| dc.description.abstract | This study was carried out to evaluate the weight loss rates, carbon and nitrogen dynamics of wood stakes following soil amendment treatments (CLB: compound fertilizer + lime + biochar; LB: lime + biochar) in a post-fire restoration area, Ulsan Metropolitan city, southern Korea. Soil amendments in the fire-disturbed area were applied to two-times (Mar. and Jun. 2015, 2016) during the study period. Wood stakes on Mar. 2015 were buried at a top 15cm of mineral soil in two soil amendment and control treatments of Liriodendron tulipifera, Prunus yedoensis, Quercus acutissima, Pinus thunbergii plantations and an unplanted area in the post-fire restoration area. Wood stakes were collected at Oct. 2015, Mar. 2016 and Oct. 2016 to measure weight loss rates, organic carbon and nitrogen concentrations. Weight loss rates of wood stakes were not significantly affected by soil amendment treatments. However, remaining carbon of wood stakes were lowest in the control treatment (43.7%), followed by the CLB (71.3%) and the LB (71.6%) treatments. Remaining nitrogen of wood stakes was less in the control treatment (29.7%) compared with the LB treatment (52.6%). The results indicate that carbon and nitrogen mineralization of wood stakes in post-fire restoration area were delayed by soil amendment treatments. | - |
| dc.format.extent | 9 | - |
| dc.language | 한국어 | - |
| dc.language.iso | KOR | - |
| dc.publisher | 한국농림기상학회 | - |
| dc.title | 산불 훼손 복원지 내 토양개량제 처리가 Wood stakes의 탄소 및 질소 동태에 미치는 영향 | - |
| dc.title.alternative | Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics of Wood Stakes as Affected by Soil Amendment Treatments in a Post-Fire Restoration Area | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.publisher.location | 대한민국 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.5532/KJAFM.2018.20.4.357 | - |
| dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | 한국농림기상학회지, v.20, no.4, pp 357 - 365 | - |
| dc.citation.title | 한국농림기상학회지 | - |
| dc.citation.volume | 20 | - |
| dc.citation.number | 4 | - |
| dc.citation.startPage | 357 | - |
| dc.citation.endPage | 365 | - |
| dc.identifier.kciid | ART002425853 | - |
| dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
| dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Biochar | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Forest fire | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Nutrient dynamics | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Wood nutrient | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Wood decomposition | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Gyeongsang National University Central Library, 501, Jinju-daero, Jinju-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, 52828, Republic of Korea+82-55-772-0532
COPYRIGHT 2022 GYEONGSANG NATIONAL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.
