Multicenter Planning Comparison of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Major Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis (KROG 16-17)open accessMulticenter Planning Comparison of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Major Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis (KROG 16-17)
- Other Titles
- Multicenter Planning Comparison of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Major Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis (KROG 16-17)
- Authors
- 배선현; 김미숙; 장원일; 김진호; 김우철; 김진희; 정배권; 김용호; 조선미; 최철원; 박영희; 조광환
- Issue Date
- 2018
- Publisher
- 대한간암학회
- Keywords
- Hepatocellular carcinoma; Multicenter study; Portal vein; Stereotactic body radiotherapy; Survey
- Citation
- Journal of Liver Cancer, v.18, no.2, pp 130 - 141
- Pages
- 12
- Indexed
- KCI
- Journal Title
- Journal of Liver Cancer
- Volume
- 18
- Number
- 2
- Start Page
- 130
- End Page
- 141
- URI
- https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/12581
- DOI
- 10.17998/jlc.18.2.130
- ISSN
- 2288-8128
2383-5001
- Abstract
- Background/Aims: To evaluate the technical feasibility of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with the major portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT).
Methods: Ten institutions affiliated with the Korean Stereotactic Radiosurgery Group were provided the contours of four cases: the first case was the first branch PVTT with sufficient normal liver volume (NLV), the second was the first branch PVTT with insufficient NLV, the third was the main trunk PVTT at confluence level, and the fourth was the main trunk PVTT with entire length. The institutions were asked to make SBRT plans according to their current treatment protocols and to complete facility questionnaires.
Results: Based on institutional protocols, SBRT was feasible in nine institutions for the first case (32-60 Gy in 3-5 fractions), in eight institutions for the second case (32-50 Gy in 3-5 fractions), in seven institutions for the third case (35-60 Gy in 3-5 fractions), and in four institutions for the fourth case (35-42 Gy in 4-5 fractions). The other institutions recommended hypo- or conventional fractionation due to insufficient NLV or gastrointestinal organ proximity. With analysis of the SBRT dose to the central hepatobiliary tract, the major PVTT could theoretically be associated with a high risk of hepatobiliary toxicity.
Conclusions: Although SBRT is a technically feasible option for HCC with the major PVTT, there was a variability among the participating institutions. Therefore, further studies will be necessary to standardize the practice of SBRT for the major PVTT.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - College of Medicine > Department of Medicine > Journal Articles

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.