Cited 0 time in
국방품질경영시스템 인증 심사결과 분석을 통한 인증제도 개선 방안
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | 김영현 | - |
| dc.contributor.author | 이종찬 | - |
| dc.contributor.author | 최재호 | - |
| dc.contributor.author | 변재현 | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-12-26T17:46:52Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-12-26T17:46:52Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1229-1889 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2287-9005 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/12563 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Purpose: This article aims 1) to propose improvement directions of the certification by recognizing the quality management practices based on the analysis of the audit results of the military contractors and 2) to suggest some ideas on quality audit planning preparation to help the government quality assurance representatives. Methods: Based on the nonconformity report of the defense quality management system (DQMS) requirements, frequently occurring requirement components are found and summarized. Three hypothesis testings are executed to check whether the maturity levels of the quality management systems are influenced by the company size, weapon tye, and company type, regarding the nonconformity frequency as dependent variable. Results: Nonconformity occurs most frequently in the order of product realization, measurement analysis and improvement, management responsibility, resource management, and quality management system. Nonconformity reduces when the company size increases, for the guided weapons, and in the defense companies. Conclusion: Since small-sized companies are inferior to larger companies with respect to the DQMS maturity level, more support should be provided to these small-sized companies which produce military supplies. | - |
| dc.format.extent | 18 | - |
| dc.language | 한국어 | - |
| dc.language.iso | KOR | - |
| dc.publisher | 한국품질경영학회 | - |
| dc.title | 국방품질경영시스템 인증 심사결과 분석을 통한 인증제도 개선 방안 | - |
| dc.title.alternative | Improving Certification System by Analyzing Audit Result of the Defense Quality Management System | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.publisher.location | 대한민국 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.7469/JKSQM.2018.46.3.465 | - |
| dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | 품질경영학회지, v.46, no.3, pp 465 - 482 | - |
| dc.citation.title | 품질경영학회지 | - |
| dc.citation.volume | 46 | - |
| dc.citation.number | 3 | - |
| dc.citation.startPage | 465 | - |
| dc.citation.endPage | 482 | - |
| dc.identifier.kciid | ART002387917 | - |
| dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
| dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Defense Quality Management System | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Military Contractors | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Audit Result | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Nonconformity Report | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Gyeongsang National University Central Library, 501, Jinju-daero, Jinju-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, 52828, Republic of Korea+82-55-772-0532
COPYRIGHT 2022 GYEONGSANG NATIONAL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.
