그린케어(Green Care) 도입을 위한 시설과 프로그램 유형분류 및 중요도 분석Classification and Prioritizing the Importance of the Facility and Program for Green Care Introduction
- Other Titles
- Classification and Prioritizing the Importance of the Facility and Program for Green Care Introduction
- Authors
- 최영완; 김영주
- Issue Date
- 2019
- Publisher
- 한국농촌계획학회
- Keywords
- Green care; Care farming; Rural development project; AHP; Delphi
- Citation
- 농촌계획, v.25, no.4, pp 77 - 86
- Pages
- 10
- Indexed
- KCI
- Journal Title
- 농촌계획
- Volume
- 25
- Number
- 4
- Start Page
- 77
- End Page
- 86
- URI
- https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/10066
- DOI
- 10.7851/Ksrp.2019.25.4.077
- ISSN
- 1225-8857
2288-9493
- Abstract
- The purpose of this study is to survey and analyze the operating state and characteristics of domestic and foreign green care, prioritize the facilities and programs for green care introduction through expert survey of importance, and thereby to provide a basic material for introducing green care in facilities in Rural Development Project districts, including domestic rural experience facilities. Domestic and foreign literature was analyzed in order to classify the necessary facilities programs, of green care, and the analysis results were modified and supplemented through Expert Delphi Survey. Based on the results, AHP based importance survey was conducted. In terms of the facilities and programs for green care introduction, necessary facilities (H/W) were categorized into four types (accommodation facility, resting facility, experience facility, therapy facility) and S/W programs into three types (learning experience type, therapy type, and care type). To verify the reliability of the AHP based importance survey, Consistency Index (C.I.) was analyzed. As a result, the C.I. value of nine respondents ranged from 0.000 to 0.083 so that the survey was found to have high consistency. The importance of S/W programs was 0.627, and that of H/W facilities was 0.373. For green care introduction, programs were found to be more important. Regarding the categories of necessary facilities, therapy facility had the highest value, or 0.348; experience facility 0.253; accommodation facility 0.211; resting facility 0.188. Therefore, therapy facility and experience facility were found to be important. In case of S/W programs, therapy type had the highest value, or 0.499, and learning experience type (0.255) and care type (0.246) were similarly important. Generally, the categories that had high importance values tended to show a remarkable difference in importance of their sub categories. In particular, facilities or therapy programs using natural ecology and forests were found to be highly important. In conclusion, it is required to actively review the introduction of active programs using resources, such as existing experience facilities and accommodation facilities and villages forests, and programs making the body and soul comfortable, such as natural ecology experience, Green Shower, and horticulture activity.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - 농업생명과학대학 > Department of Agricultural Engineering, GNU > Journal Articles

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.