Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

그린케어(Green Care) 도입을 위한 시설과 프로그램 유형분류 및 중요도 분석Classification and Prioritizing the Importance of the Facility and Program for Green Care Introduction

Other Titles
Classification and Prioritizing the Importance of the Facility and Program for Green Care Introduction
Authors
최영완김영주
Issue Date
2019
Publisher
한국농촌계획학회
Keywords
Green care; Care farming; Rural development project; AHP; Delphi
Citation
농촌계획, v.25, no.4, pp 77 - 86
Pages
10
Indexed
KCI
Journal Title
농촌계획
Volume
25
Number
4
Start Page
77
End Page
86
URI
https://scholarworks.gnu.ac.kr/handle/sw.gnu/10066
DOI
10.7851/Ksrp.2019.25.4.077
ISSN
1225-8857
2288-9493
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to survey and analyze the operating state and characteristics of domestic and foreign green care, prioritize the facilities and programs for green care introduction through expert survey of importance, and thereby to provide a basic material for introducing green care in facilities in Rural Development Project districts, including domestic rural experience facilities. Domestic and foreign literature was analyzed in order to classify the necessary facilities programs, of green care, and the analysis results were modified and supplemented through Expert Delphi Survey. Based on the results, AHP based importance survey was conducted. In terms of the facilities and programs for green care introduction, necessary facilities (H/W) were categorized into four types (accommodation facility, resting facility, experience facility, therapy facility) and S/W programs into three types (learning experience type, therapy type, and care type). To verify the reliability of the AHP based importance survey, Consistency Index (C.I.) was analyzed. As a result, the C.I. value of nine respondents ranged from 0.000 to 0.083 so that the survey was found to have high consistency. The importance of S/W programs was 0.627, and that of H/W facilities was 0.373. For green care introduction, programs were found to be more important. Regarding the categories of necessary facilities, therapy facility had the highest value, or 0.348; experience facility 0.253; accommodation facility 0.211; resting facility 0.188. Therefore, therapy facility and experience facility were found to be important. In case of S/W programs, therapy type had the highest value, or 0.499, and learning experience type (0.255) and care type (0.246) were similarly important. Generally, the categories that had high importance values tended to show a remarkable difference in importance of their sub categories. In particular, facilities or therapy programs using natural ecology and forests were found to be highly important. In conclusion, it is required to actively review the introduction of active programs using resources, such as existing experience facilities and accommodation facilities and villages forests, and programs making the body and soul comfortable, such as natural ecology experience, Green Shower, and horticulture activity.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
농업생명과학대학 > Department of Agricultural Engineering, GNU > Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Young Joo photo

Kim, Young Joo
농업생명과학대학 (지역시스템공학과)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE